id	SiteName	Handle	Longitude	Latitude	Altitude	Source	AgeOlder	AgeYounger	lon_alb_km	lat_alb_km	alt_km	new.biostrat.dates	reservoir	averaged	final.check	age.model-old	new.age.model	type	smooth	hiatus	notes	Should Jack review?	Should Jessica revisit?	Jack Comments	Final notes
1	Three Pines Bog	3PINES	-80.116667	47	294	access	7173	-26	1132.830929	922.0215141	176.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			age model and new dates are good			OK	ok
2	Aino Pond	AINO	-71.9254	42.6805	354	excel	1354	-37	1834.842724	550.7897467	212.4	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
4	Alexis Lake	ALEXISLK	-57.033333	52.516667	200	access	22796	30	2455.491191	1986.402749	120	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
5	Alexander Lake	ALEXLAKE	-60.583333	53.333333	143	access	6525	4562	2208.178799	1986.887237	85.8	n		y	y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
7	Aliuk Pond	ALIUK	-57.366667	54.583333	25	access	7886	2296	2340.606621	2198.005865	15	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
11	Anderson Lake	ANDERSLK	-92.716667	46.416667	0	access	12609	12184	237.6102342	762.1605156	0	n		y	y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
12	Anderson Pond	ANDERSON	-85.5	36.033333	305	access	28269	-26	893.8370673	-417.0667913	183	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.45"	4	0.45		"removed the Quercus rise, but with linear interpolation there is a section that goes backward in time.  Instead fit a smooth spline."			"Yes, definitely remove Quercus.  Smooth spline OK."	ok
15	Lac ? l'Ange	ANGE	-70.684722	47.481667	648	access	12365	0	1777.534784	1122.47494	388.8	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
16	Lake Annie	ANNIE	-81.3471	27.2103	33.7	excel	13687	215	1402.351678	-1380.448182	20.22	n		y	y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
17	Appleman Lake	APPLEMAN	-85.2136	41.6237	294	excel	19731	5364	843.3728303	239.7097077	176.4	y			y	Linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.2"	4	0.2		"removed the Quercus rise, kept Picea decline as this seemed to fit in well with the other dates.  Author and NAPD models accept/reject different ages.  I relied on the author decisions about which dates to reject, did not average the dates, and fit a smooth spline through the ages.  Dropped smooth to 0.2, which makes it a bit more wiggly 10-15ka."	y		Approve Quercus removal and other rejected dates. 	ok
18	Arrington Marsh	ARRINGTO	-95.526667	39.495	280	access	29180	19195	38.34343774	-59.45810926	168	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
19	Lake Arthur	ARTHURB	-92.6598	30.0772	1	excel	8501	-7	309.2852815	-1154.371189	0.6	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
20	Lake Arthur	ARTHURE	-92.6598	30.0772	1	excel	3366	-34	309.2852815	-1154.371189	0.6	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
21	Lac des Atocas	ATO	-73.311111	45.543056	114	access	11981	0	1651.116833	853.4022422	68.4	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1			"removed the Alnus decline, accepted other pollen dates, kept the age model the same"			OK	ok
22	Axe Lake	AXELAKE	-79.51	45.38	323	access	9689	-15	1208.778261	740.9997803	193.8	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"accepted the Picea decline as a new date, rejected the basal date."			"Seems OK.  Would have liked to check publication, but McAndrews never published data."	ok
25	Ballston Lake	BALLSTON	-73.8481	42.9566	76	excel	12611	1714	1683.544734	546.777011	45.6	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"rejected the picea rise, accepted the tsuga decline and picea decline. Kept age model the same"			OK.  Nice to see most of the interpolated ages behaving well.	ok
26	Balsam Lake	BALSAM	-74.601	42.03	762	excel	15019	-28	1651.82537	426.9067756	457.2	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			kept the Tsuga decline date and age model intact.			OK.  Nice to see Tsuga behaving	ok
27	Barchampe Lake	BARCHAMP	-83.253889	30.622222	34	access	8095	-32	1168.476366	-1018.198517	20.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
28	Barry Lake	BARRY	-77.916667	44.3	167	access	10638	-17	1348.418247	636.9687244	100.2	y			y	"linear interpolation (new age model=smooth spline, smoothing=0.2)"	Linear interpolation	1			"accepted the Picea decline as a new date, rejected the basal date."			OK. 	ok
29	Baseball Bog	BASEBALL	-79.78	47.23	292	access	10821	-21	1151.990139	952.8261429	175.2	y			y	"linear interpolation (new age model=smooth spline, smoothing=0.4)"	Linear interpolation	1			"accepted the Picea decline as a new date, rejected the basal date."	y		"Seems OK.  Would have liked to check publication, but McAndrews never published data."	ok
30	Basin Pond	BASINPND	-70.05	44.47	124	access	1605	15	1917.142371	792.1099453	74.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1				y	y	Nice to have a varved recordƒ but it's odd that the age-depth plot is a perfectly straight line.  Seems a little suspicious.  Doublecheck.	JLB doublechecked Neotoma and this is correct.  The age is equal to the depth for all depths
31	Basswood Road Lake/Splan Pond	BASSWOOD	-67.330556	45.255556	106	access	NA	NA	2084.54136	938.5306971	63.6	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
32	Lac Bastien	BASTIEN	-78.916667	46.4	305	access	10830	-35	1230.215106	867.224747	183	y			y	2nd degree polynomial (least squares)	2nd degree polynomial	2	2		"accepted the Picea decline as a new date, rejected the basal date, kept age model the same"	y		I think we should reject our biostrat ages and just keep the 14C dates hereƒ. See notes below on Graham Lake.	"rejected all new pollen ages, accepted all rc dates, kept 2nd deg poly."
33	Bates Marsh	BATESON	-81.844444	42.345556	175	excel	4694	27	1092.388824	358.6741663	105	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
36	Bear Bog	BEARBOG	-80.16	47.18	304	access	9574	4078	1126.237153	942.4457173	182.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1				y		OK	
38	Beaver Lake	BEAVERWI	-88.1555	44.9205	230	excel	5954	-35	581.769687	605.3889399	138	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
41	Belmont Bog	BELMONT	-77.916667	42.25	497	access	14500	48	1394.357773	399.0669238	298.2	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"**  Switch to 2nd deg poly? Some of the radiocarbon dates are in line with biostrat ages, others are not.  Smooth spline favors rc dates, 2nd deg poly favors pollen dates"	yy	y	"A tough one.  I favor keeping both Picea and the RC dates and fit a spline.  This is a case where we have alternate information and no clear way to decide, so let's use all.  My second preferred option is to discard 2 RC dates because they are older and likely are bulk-seds."	"kept all dates, fit a spline with smooth=0.3"
42	Bereziuk	BER	-76.120278	54.047222	205	access	7387	90	1242.265128	1783.077475	123	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
43	Berry Pond	BERRYPND	-73.316667	42.5	600	access	14030	54	1735.958585	503.9001022	360	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.35"	4	0.35		"left all dates in the chron except alnus decline, no dates were averaged.  Fit a smooth spline"	y	y	"This is a case where the radiocarbon chronology seems pretty clean -  the radiocarbon dates are bulk sediments but the site is in a bedrock-schist, low-carbonate watershed and the dates are in good stratigraphic order.  This site technically isn't a golden spike, but we should use its dates over the pollen-interp dates.  Ditch Picea, Alnus, & Tsuga.  On the other hand, its not clear why those 3 dates were rejected.  Perhaps readd and fit a spline?"	"Kept all dates except Alnus decline (including dates rejected by authors), fit a smooth spline with smooth=0.35"
44	Big John Pond	BIGJOHN	-94.966667	47.558333	421	access	3374	-31	73.32598099	893.1560581	252.6	n	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
45	Big Pond	BIGPOND	-78.55	39.766667	634	access	12879	0	1399.751092	101.6732216	380.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
46	Big Reed Pond Hollow	BIGREED	-69.0675	46.353333	370	excel	6120	94	1925.43412	1025.931969	222	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
48	Binnewater Pond	BINNEWTR	-74.5467	41.4128	256	excel	27320	-40	1672.304562	356.8028648	153.6	y			y	"Linear interpolation (new age model = smooth spline, smoothing =0.3)"	Linear interpolation	1		"1020, 1060"	Reject 8900 C14 date and keep age model at linear interpolation.	y	y	"A very tricky one.  Based on the pollen diagram in Fig. 2 of Robinson et al. 2005, I strongly suspect that there is a hiatus right below the 8900 14C date.  It is highly suspicious that all 3 pollen-strat dates cluster on the exact same depth interval; this indicates some missing record.  Keep the 8900 date and reject our 3 pollen-strat dates.  And I would separately fit age models for the Pleistocene & Holocene radiocarbon dates."	"inserted hiatus between 1020 and 1060 depth, rejected all pollen dates"
49	Bishops Falls	BISHOPSF	-55.505556	48.936111	75	access	7194	129	2719.737372	1644.931455	45	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
50	Black Gum Swamp	BLACKGUM	-72.175	42.542	358	excel	13060	-31	1820.294355	530.1293869	214.8	y			y	"linear interpolation (new age model=smooth spline, smoothing=0.4)"	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.35"	4	0.35		"Decided to keep all ages and fit a smooth spline, with smoothing=0.35"	y	y?	"This is OK.  The Alnus decline looks pretty subtle/gradual to me, so might be safer to ditch and keep all other dates."	"rejected Alnus, fit a smooth spline with smooth=0.35"
51	Black Pond	BLACKPND	-84.186667	35.620833	262	access	2536	-24	1011.098871	-451.8767961	157.2	n	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
52	Blackwoods Hollow	BLACKWDS	-68.2204	44.3133	30	excel	11430	921	2053.901873	812.6480298	18	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new dates and age model are good.			OK	ok
54	BL-Tombigbee	BLBIGBEE	-88.474444	33.563333	49	access	10996	27	664.1691121	-729.0251739	29.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
56	Blue Mounds Creek	BLUMOUND	-89.866667	43.083333	335	access	12124	0	469.106074	379.3372606	201	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new dates and age model are good.			OK	ok
59	Bog D	BOGD	-95.166667	47.183333	457	access	9524	-10	59.52305266	848.789048	274.2	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new dates and age model are good.			OK	ok
60	Bondi Section	BONDI	-82.6375	42.088056	211	access	16060	15976	1035.88112	319.6648187	126.6	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
61	Boney Spring	BONEYSPR	-93.366944	38.111944	210	access	31947	24234	217.794442	-219.4350406	126	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
62	Border Beacon	BORDER	-63.2	55.333333	470	access	7407	0	1973.427114	2145.696641	282	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
63	Boriack Bog	BORIACKB	-97.126111	30.36	143	access	18464	0	-103.9033563	-1126.553644	85.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
65	Lac Boucan?	BOUC	-69.452778	47.457778	500	access	10206	500	1862.596973	1143.415161	300	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
68	Bradshaw Lake peat section	BRADSHAW	-95.181389	57.767778	215	excel	7197	-42	47.84542501	2079.297559	129	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
69	Brandreth Bog	BRANDRET	-74.683333	43.916667	600	access	12218	33	1595.859046	642.8423977	360	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new dates and old dates line up pretty well.  Kept all dates and original age model			OK	ok
70	Brisay 2	BRI2	-70.357778	54.355833	595	access	6814	0	1585.007416	1903.743726	357	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
71	Brier Island Bog MS-85-22	BRIERISL	-66.340833	44.286667	15	excel	14551	11474	2189.424479	851.7107042	9	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
75	Browns Pond	BROWNSPD	-79.616389	38.154722	620	access	20338	0	1347.749547	-100.6726904	372	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.4"	4	0.4		changed age model to smooth spline because I didn't average the dates and too many reversals in linear interp.  New dates are fine (because this is a benchmark site for all new ages).  See notes on pdf file	y		OK	ok
76	Buck Lake	BUCKLAKE	-81.332222	27.234444	45	access	8963	0	1403.339089	-1377.502443	27	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
77	Buckley Pond Hollow	BUCKLEY	-69.04	46.331944	360	excel	9775	181	1928.055441	1024.066774	216	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			age model looks good.  New age is fine (because this is a benchmark site for the new age)			OK	ok
78	Bucyrus Bog	BUCYRUS	-82.933333	40.797222	318	access	18374	9315	1034.042456	165.4559453	190.8	y			y	2nd order polynomial	2nd degree polynomial	2	2		age model and new pollen age look good.			OK	ok
79	Burden Lake	BURDEN	-73.566667	42.604167	192	access	9708	1786	1714.300564	511.3140435	115.2	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			Rejected one date in favor of Tsuga decline.  Age model looks good			OK	ok
81	Lac ? la Busque	BUSQUE	-70.595833	46.279167	330	access	10268	188	1821.20066	987.3039969	198	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1			The Tsuga decline date fills in a big gap.  Keep the Tsuga decline in here. Age model is fine			OK	ok
82	Byron-Bergen Swamp (Site 2)	BYRONMRL	-78.005833	43.095833	180	excel	12069	-11	1368.704831	495.9255895	108	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"accept all dates, new and old.  Age model is good."			OK	ok
83	Byron-Bergen Swamp (Site 1)	BYRONSWP	-78.00582	43.09582	180	excel	5937	130	1368.706098	495.9242682	108	y			y	Linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		rejected the age at 185 cm in favor of Tsuga decline	y	y	"This is a case where I don't trust either date.  The 14C dates are bulk sediments from a 'marly peat.'  But The Tsuga decline at this site is pretty sparsely documented in the pollen record - hard to know where to place it.  Recommed keeping both, fitting a polynomial or spline."	"accepted all dates, fit a smooth spline with smooth=0.3"
84	Cahaba Pond	CAHABA	-86.533333	33.5	204	access	13771	650	835.7069487	-721.0218618	122.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
88	Saint-Calixte	CAL	-73.868056	45.961111	261	access	11151	94	1599.91073	891.8621792	156.6	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1			"Reject the Quercus rise age.  Accept Picea decline and Tsuga decline.  But, this means rapid sed rate between Picea decline and basal date.  Is this ok?  Linear interpolation ok, though 2nd polynomial also works well."	y		OK.  This is an unpublished PJH Richard paper.	ok
89	Camel Lake	CAMEL	-85.016667	30.266667	20	access	35898	0	1012.4079	-1079.235287	12	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1		475					
90	Camp 11 Lake	CAMP11LK	-88.016667	46.666667	549	access	11900	104	574.6929865	811.7709321	329.4	n			y	quadratic regression	2nd degree polynomial	2	2						
93	Canyon Lake	CANYON	-87.921389	46.833333	260	access	11037	112	579.8608944	831.9517274	156	y				linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			** Need to finish this site	yy	y	"A tough one, given that the 14C dates and poll-strat dates are so out of whack.  And this is a 1970s-era M. Davis paper, so likely relies on bulk-sediment dates.  On the other hand, a) the 14C dates are in good stratigraphic order and b) this site is in northern MI, where Great Lakes could be strongly affecting regional climate.  Safest to keep 14C dates and reject poll-strat dates."	ok. Kept all original c14 dates and rejected new biostrat ages
94	Capitola Lake	CAPITOLA	-89.5538	45.5202	460	excel	7628	-5	473.4303985	668.2688336	276	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
95	Tourbi?re Caribou	CAR	-71.235833	47.639722	790	access	5552	2338	1734.919088	1130.255935	474	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
97	Lac Caribou	CARIB	-64.94	48.197778	116	access	10998	74	2140.604395	1321.969703	69.6	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
98	Caribou Bog	CARIBBOG	-68.766667	45.933333	37	access	10362	60	1960.402815	984.5091659	22.2	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"kept picea decline, rejected basal age and fit linear interpolation."	y		OK.  A 1970's era thesisƒ 14C dates likely iffy.  Good to go with biostrat dates.	ok
99	Caribou Hill	CARIBOU	-63.25	55.666667	475	access	6874	0	1957.558477	2180.724993	285	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
100	Carter Site	CARTER	-84.680556	40.216667	305	access	17895	13697	904.6452089	79.63510558	183	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
101	Lac Castor	CAS	-72.998611	46.613889	220	access	10859	136	1643.029477	981.6392714	132	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1			rejected 500803 and keep linear interpolation		y	A tricky one.  An unpublished PJH Richard site.  This is a case where I am uneasy about rejecting an independent 14C dateƒ lean towards either keeping all dates or rejecting Picea.	OK.  Rejected Picea.
102	Cedar Bog Lake	CEDARBLK	-93.197222	45.411111	275	access	8468	-10	206.3550605	642.3284604	165	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			original chron used picea decline as a basal date and both the picea and alnus dates line up well with original chron			OK - nice example of where biostrat helps.	ok
103	Chance Harbour Lake MS-85-16	CHANCEHA	-62.606944	45.672778	12	excel	16427	-35	2397.725908	1096.915117	7.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
105	Chase Pond	CHASE	-60.675	45.651389	15	access	17068	10377	2531.072797	1144.777188	9	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			age model looks good.  New age is fine (because this is a benchmark site for the new age)			OK	ok
106	Chatsworth Bog	CHAT2003	-88.323	40.676	220	excel	19981	2544	609.9459242	104.4799471	132	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"age model looks good.  New dates are fine (because this is a benchmark site for all new ages). Linear interp has too many age models with reversals, but that's ok."			OK	ok
107	"Chesapeake Bay, main branch (MD99-2207)"	CHES2207	-76.214444	38.030278	0	excel	9828	935	1626.915555	-61.67223001	0	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
108	"Chesapeake Bay, main branch (MD99-2208)"	CHES2208	-76.486389	38.537222	0	excel	8569	-37	1592.677545	-7.899416102	0	n		y	y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
109	"Chesapeake Bay, main branch (MD99-2209)"	CHES2209	-76.394444	38.886111	0	excel	7900	621	1591.637442	33.86342682	0	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
110	"Chesapeake Bay, main branch (PTMC3-2)"	CHESPTMC	-76.219722	38.026667	0	excel	1420	-17	1626.575882	-62.1784371	0	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
111	Cheyenne Bottoms	CHEYENNE	-98.666667	38.466667	547	access	29737	0	-219.3995511	-177.6221293	328.2	n			y	"linear interpolation, straight-line fit (least squares)"	Linear interpolation	1		"578, 588"	"Notes say ""Unconformity at 588 cm (Fredlund 1995). Linear interpolation between top 3 dates plus extrapolation to 578 cm. Fit a least-squares straight line to bottom"".  To accomodate this, I added two hiatuses hiatus=c(578, 588), so will need to eliminate the ages that are inferred in the center.  I just did linear interp for both sections."			OK	ok
113	Chippewa Bog	CHIPPEWA	-83.241111	43.123889	270	access	10787	1189	972.9520434	434.5237689	162	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"Rejected basal age, kept picea decline and fit linear interpolation"	y		OK	ok
114	Chism 1	CHISM1	-76.145556	54.799444	340	access	6150	0	1222.626525	1867.817099	204	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
115	Chism 2	CHISM2	-76.339167	53.090833	273	access	7173	0	1251.639485	1671.610441	163.8	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
117	Clear Lake (US:Iowa)	CLEARLIA	-93.35	43.15	374	access	12085	-30	202.5792425	374.8681919	224.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"reject Quercus rise.  Keep Picea decline and Ulmus decline, keep linear interpolation"			OK	ok
119	Clear Pond (US:South Carolina)	CLEARPND	-78.953611	33.798611	10	access	22466	101	1493.003444	-593.3699534	6	y			y	2nd order polynomial	2nd degree polynomial	2	2		age model looks good.  New dates are fine (because this is a benchmark site for all new ages).			OK	ok
120	Clearwater Lake	CLEARWTR	-107.933333	50.873611	686	access	7330	0	-795.6431914	1332.678102	411.6	n	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
122	Coghill Lake	COGHILL	-66.766667	53.9	530	access	6161	-31	1816.371044	1917.587355	318	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
123	Colo Marsh	COLOMSH	-93.27	42.02	329	access	13146	0	212.5383387	241.5561138	197.4	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"Picea decline and alnus decline line up pretty close to one another (within 300 years).  So, accept pollen dates, reject 500747 and 500748.  Linear interpolation is fine."	y		Recommend accepting all and fitting spline/poly.	"accepted all rc and pollen ages, fit a spline with smooth="
124	Comb Lake	COMBLAKE	-57.71	49.69	678	access	7953	63	2545.239352	1664.809446	406.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
125	Compass Pond	COMPASS	-56.196389	50.034167	236	access	11400	-13	2623.517497	1743.110682	141.6	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
127	Conroy Lake	CONROY	-67.883333	46.283333	140	access	1940	7	2010.064781	1042.592717	84	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
128	Conroy Lake	CONROYME	-67.8735	46.2912	137	excel	12951	9205	2010.475416	1043.689583	82.2	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			age model looks good.  New age is fine (because this is a benchmark site for the new age)			OK	ok
129	Lac C?t?	COT	-65.95	48.966944	915	access	11184	0	2045.159127	1385.564044	549	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
130	Tourbi?re de Lanoraie COTEAU JAUNE	COTJ	-73.341944	45.960833	18	access	7270	888	1637.232624	900.812995	10.8	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		rejected one date in favor of Tsuga decline.  Age model is fine.			XX REVISIT WAITING ON ILL	"bulk-sediment dates from the Canadian Shield, not much reason to think there are old-carbon issues.  Accept all dates and fit a spline."
131	Cottonwood Lake (US:South Dakota)	COTTONWD	-99.906389	44.836111	549	access	13061	-382	-290.368206	577.3152073	329.4	y			y	loess curve	Loess curve	5	0.75		"needed to eliminate outlier dates in .csv file to get loess to work, so see full list of dates in the -orig.csv file. Or in the ""smooth.spline-notes.pdf"" file.  Pollen ages are good- this is a benchmark site"			OK	ok
133	Cowles Bog	COWLES	-87.092	41.637	184	excel	6610	85	696.8344404	226.0125704	110.4	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
134	Cranberry Lake	CRANBER	-78.1	44.1	170	access	13497	-26	1339.348618	611.1542781	102	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"new ages are great, age model is great."			OK (yay!)	ok
136	Cranberry Glades	CRANGLDS	-80.283333	38.2	1029	access	14099	56	1292.520426	-104.70809	617.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
137	Crates Lake	CRATES	-81.266667	49.183333	259	access	9761	16	1011.680562	1162.905104	155.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
138	Crawford Bog	CRAWFBOG	-79.945278	43.471667	268	excel	16621	-25	1215.195515	513.2045893	160.8	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"accept quercus and alnus, reject picea, keep linear interpolation"	y		OK	ok
139	Crawford Lake (CA:Ontario)	CRAWFDC	-79.947778	43.469444	278	excel	11022	-44	1215.052381	512.913539	166.8	y				"Linear interpolation (new age model = smooth spline, smoothing =0.3)"	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		keep all ages and use a smooth spline?  Resulting age model seems pretty good. Or else reject radiocarbon ages and just rely on pollen ages	yy	y	"OK, keep all dates"	"kept all dates, fit a smooth spline"
142	Crider's Pond	CRIDERS	-77.55	39.966667	290	access	18334	0	1474.416664	140.0002683	174	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"rejected Alnus decline, kept Quercus and Tsuga.  Linear interp is fine"	y		OK	ok
143	Cristal Lake	CRISTAL	-90.083333	52.116667	355	access	7547	436	386.2099448	1439.926815	213	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
144	Crooked Lake (Northwest Basin)	CROOKEDN	-89.2907	46.247	519	excel	11746	-9	486.6511068	755.2404245	311.4	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
145	Crooked Lake (Resort Basin)	CROOKEDR	-89.2681	46.2503	519	excel	86	-41	488.2599708	755.7453267	311.4	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
146	Crooked Lake (Undisturbed Basin)	CROOKEDU	-89.2681	46.2503	519	excel	218	-40	488.2599708	755.7453267	311.4	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
147	Crystal Lake	CRYSTAL	-88.3442	42.2306	273	excel	16921	6598	593.4532516	287.3556648	163.8	y			y	Linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.45"	4	0.45		New dates are fine (because this is a benchmark site for all new ages). Changed age model to smooth spline because linear interp had age reversals in one section	y		OK	ok
148	Cub Lake	CUB2	-85.958333	44.7	360	access	9970	24	746.9299207	594.8423607	216	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
149	Cupola Pond	CUPOLA	-91.1	36.8	244	access	20630	0	413.1447791	-365.991002	146.4	y				"linear interpolation, straight line fit (just doing linear interpolation for now)"	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.5"	4	0.5		"**not sure what to do. Rejected two rc dates and Alnus, fit a stiff smooth spline"	yy	y	Reject biostrat dates.  This is in Missouri where a) Alnus may be totally behaving differently from New England and b) Picea critchfieldii wreaks havoc with our Picea biostrat dates.	"ok, rejected both pollen dates, accepted all rc dates, fit spline with smooth=0.5"
150	Cycloid Lake	CYCLOID	-105.266667	55.266667	369	access	9460	0	-568.6582577	1820.991294	221.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
153	South Dansville buried peat	DANSVILL	-77.6315	42.4984	572	excel	18535	1104	1410.420454	432.0981589	343.2	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			age model and new ages are good			OK	ok
155	Daumont	DAU	-69.4	54.883333	607	access	6071	588	1625.803163	1978.598916	364.2	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
156	Devil's Bathtub	DBATHTUB	-77.573889	43.024444	198	excel	13001	2058	1402.780042	493.9569696	118.8	y			y	Linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"used Tsuga decline rather than adjacent radiocarbon age, but the dates look good overall."		y	Perhaps instead keep both and fit a spline or poly?	"ok, kept all dates and fit a spline"
157	Dead Frog Pond	DEADFROG	-72.508611	42.574444	80	excel	2179	-36	1794.392845	527.4844772	48	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
158	Decoy Lake	DECOY	-80.366667	43.233333	260	access	13570	40	1188.218565	480.0840561	156	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			age model looks good.  New age is fine (because this is a benchmark site for the new age)			OK	ok
159	Deep Lake	DEEPLAKE	-95.401	47.684	410	excel	7706	144	42.41236602	907.7072845	246	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
160	Deep Pond	DEEPPOND	-69.9911	41.7395	23	excel	2294	-49	2008.814728	482.6668192	13.8	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
161	Deer Lake Bog	DEER	-71.833333	44.033333	1325	access	15309	0	1801.383973	707.3099231	795	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"Accept all new ages, keep linear age model."			OK	ok
162	Delorme 1	DEL1	-69.918889	54.418889	513	access	6017	371	1609.473327	1918.160623	307.8	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
163	Delorme 2	DEL2	-69.929722	54.423611	538	access	7110	420	1608.673502	1918.50219	322.8	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
164	Demont Lake	DEMONT	-85.0532	43.5084	268	excel	13239	12	830.1973665	462.3861129	160.8	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"Accept all new ages, keep linear age model."			OK	ok
167	Devils Lake (US:North Dakota)	DEVILSLK	-98.933333	48.083333	448	access	7003	78	-206.207593	957.8301487	268.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
168	Devils Lake (US:Wisconsin)	DEVILSWI	-89.7256	43.4273	294	access	14747	9550	477.1909978	420.6109854	176.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"devilswi is not a benchmark site for ulmus.  it is a benchmark site for picea, quercus, and alnus.  accept all ages.  Set dmin=470 (don't interpolate ages to the top of the core) "			OK	ok
169	Diana 375	DIA375	-69.958333	60.9875	114	access	7681	0	1405.210004	2633.848251	68.4	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
170	Lac du Diable	DIAB	-66.125	48.910833	494	access	12550	0	2035.693252	1375.522599	296.4	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
171	Dismal Swamp (91)	DISMAL	-76.45	36.583333	6	access	9884	40	1642.641198	-232.1234634	3.6	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
173	Disterhaft Farm Bog	DISTRHFT	-89.166944	43.916944	244	access	14350	3060	515.4400527	481.2753583	146.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"chron notes say there is a hiatus after the first date.  Since you need at least two dates to interpolate, can't set ages of the top section.  So, removed top date at 205 cm, rejected Quercus age and accepted Picea.  Linear interpolation ok"			"OK (although with some uneasiness because this is a 1970-bulk-dated record from WI, so there is a very good chance that the 14C dates are too old.  But you're right that the Quercus and Picea biostrat dates are in conflict, and so your decision to keep Picea and reject Quercus is reasonable."	ok
174	Divers Lake	DIVERS	-78.3993	43.0411	239	excel	13651	-43	1340.319041	483.9480697	143.4	y	y		y	Linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		rejected Alnus decline.  Rejected radiocarbon date at 450 in favor of Tsuga date at 455.  Age model as is.	y			"Rejected Alnus decline.  Two other ages rejected by original authors (at 350 and 660 cm depth).  All dates unaveraged.  Accepted both Tsuga and nearby date, fit a spline through all ages."
178	Dosquet	DOSQUET	-71.5	46.45	140	access	9734	169	1752.703975	989.7362398	84	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1			"Accept new age, keep same age model"			OK	ok
179	Duarte Pond	DUARTE	-70.6137	41.4211	18	excel	2583	-50	1971.849068	433.3585867	10.8	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
180	Duck Pond	DUCKPOND	-70.000556	41.932778	2	access	13541	0	2001.918654	504.4467808	1.2	n		y	y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
181	Lac Dufresne	DUFRESNE	-70.35	45.85	650	access	12748	150	1851.941275	943.2086487	390	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"Accept all new ages, keep linear age model."			OK	ok
182	Dugas Bay Bog	DUGASBAY	-79.365	46.320278	202	excel	4683	-30	1199.909366	852.2139027	121.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
184	Eagle Lake Bog	EAGLE	-71.666667	44.166667	1275	access	10348	0	1809.533048	725.7315258	765	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"Accept new age, keep same age model"			OK	ok
186	Eagle Lake	EAGLELK	-58.55	53.233333	400	access	12322	20	2332.954795	2024.818194	240	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
187	Eagle Pond	EAGLEPND	-70.1349	41.6992	11	excel	3849	-50	1999.268873	475.0432843	6.6	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
189	East Baltic Bog	EBALTIC	-62.15	46.408333	45	access	9382	-20	2398.775696	1189.938684	27	n	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
192	E Lake	ELAKE68	-99.658333	50.691389	735	access	12886	-18	-245.3240997	1265.918469	441	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
193	Ely Lake	ELYLAKE	-75.833333	41.766667	384	access	2370	10	1564.752237	375.632597	230.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
194	Emrick Lake	EMRICK	-89.594	43.8	270	excel	13752	-54	484.2098787	465.2341718	162	y			y	3rd order polynomial	3rd order polynomial	2	3		age model and new ages look good.			OK	ok
195	Lake Erie	ERIE	-82.76	41.92	168	access	14413	-11	1029.210989	298.6698843	100.8	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			age model and new ages look good.			OK	ok
196	East Soldier Lake	ESOLDIER	-84.858	46.347	272	excel	9385	17	805.6012505	797.216849	163.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
197	Lac ? la Fourche	ESPOIR	-70.615833	47.609722	305	access	10752	0	1778.260731	1138.330209	183	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
198	East Twin Lake (US:Ohio)	ETWINOH	-81.333333	41.198611	322	access	13067	40	1152.400718	230.7956858	193.2	y			y	NA (just doing linear interpolation for now)	Linear interpolation	1			linear interpolation age model and new ages look good.  Jack- look at difference in pre-res correct (interpolated-notes.pdf file vs interpolated.pdf)	y	y	"A nice case where our biostrat date is consistent with Shane's original estimation of a hardwater effect.  So yes, let's keep Shane's 700-year correction for all the 14C dates and keep the Picea age."	"great, kept as is (with res correction, which varied from 700-2400 years)"
200	Fakahatchee Strand Preserve State Park	FAKIII98	-81.4417	25.9816	2	excel	4840	-40	1414.791869	-1520.239794	1.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.25"	4	0.25		changed to smooth spline to get rid of age model reversals			OK	ok
201	Lac Faribault	FAR	-71.716944	58.866944	250	access	4297	0	1372.365101	2379.981522	150	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
202	Tourbi?re de Farnham	FARN1	-72.982778	45.282778	53	access	8979	0	1681.935827	829.3114703	31.8	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
204	Fawn Lake (CA:Ontario)	FAWN	-79.39	45.41	333	access	11185	-30	1216.866957	746.0256914	199.8	y			y	linear interpolation (new age model==2nd order polynomial)	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"rejected basal age as well as rc age near tsuga decline, kept linear model"		y	"An unpublished Jock McANdrews site, likely with bulk sed dates.  So definitely keep Picea and reject the basal age.  However, let's keep the mid-Holo RC date (and the tsuga decline) and change the age model to a polynomial or spline."	"ok.  Only rejected basal rc date, kept all other dates.  Fit spline with smooth=0.3"
206	First Pond	FIRST	-75.026667	41.135278	326	access	170	-34	1642.702299	316.4536461	195.6	n			y	linear interpolation with extrapolation	Linear interpolation	1							
207	Beaverhouse Lake	FLINFLON	-101.681667	54.742222	305	access	8229	-26	-352.6297984	1743.280215	183	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
208	Forge Pond	FORGE	-74.399167	40.855833	69	access	169	-25	1698.462573	295.3455342	41.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
211	Frains Lake	FRAINSLK	-83.63	42.33	271	access	14328	22	955.6760437	337.5653597	162.6	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"rejected one age at 1095, accepted both pollen ages.  Model is ok"	y		OK.  Original dates were all bulk seds.	ok
212	Hayes Lake	FRBLAKE	-93.75	49.583333	391	access	11111	227	153.9919821	1132.978855	234.6	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
213	Frenchmens Bay	FRENCHBY	-79.1	43.82	75	access	2720	-26	1271.211929	564.8439115	45	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
214	Fresh Pond (US:Massachusetts)	FRESH	-70.5315	41.5958	7	excel	2037	-44	1972.602492	454.9656239	4.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
215	Fresh Pond	FRESHPND	-71.575	41.158333	28	access	14222	-38	1906.781917	383.7252132	16.8	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.2"	4	0.2		"rejected one age at 367, accepted both pollen ages.  Model is ok"		y	Suggest keeping 14C date and changing age model to polynomial or spline.	"accepted all rc and pollen ages.  Fit a spline, smooth=0.2"
216	Fudger Lake	FUDGER	-83.533333	40.1	320	access	13537	-17	997.6310766	77.48905042	192	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			unclear which age to accept.  Chose the with the middle age-- Picea decline-- which is usually more reliable than the other two ages.  Rejected the other two ages. Linear interpolation ok	y		"OK. I agree with decision to keep Picea, reject other two."	ok
217	Furnival Lake	FURNIVAL	-84.93	48.21	440	access	8333	-28	774.8172404	1014.853597	264	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
218	Saint-Gabriel	GABRIEL	-73.475833	46.275833	250	access	10055	92	1618.985589	934.6620733	150	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1			"Accept new age, keep same age model"			OK	ok
219	Gass Lake	GASS	-87.733333	44.05	211	access	13637	0	621.9619367	505.5539713	126.6	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"Accept new age, keep same age model"			OK	ok
223	Little Salt Spring (GDF 141)	GDF141	-82.233	27.0748	6	excel	9207	5	1320.422798	-1408.473596	3.6	n		y	y	Linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.4		"age model goes backwards through one section, so switched to a smooth spline"	y		OK	ok
226	Lac Geai	GEAI	-73.992778	45.995833	365	access	11635	0	1590.114152	893.7539999	219	y				linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1			"**not sure how to handle this site.  Big discrepancy between alnus age and the basal radiocarbon age (only 1 rc age in whole core).  I am inclined to reject alnus, because that minimizes sed rate changes.  But, could also reject rc date since there's only 1. "	yy	y	"The Alnus decline is not very pronounced at this site.  Recommend ditching biostrat date and just keeping 14C age.  Or, might ditch this record entirely from our mapsƒ"	Rejected Alnus decline.
228	Lac ? St-Germain	GER	-74.370833	45.945833	473	access	12091	81	1564.613709	881.7137988	283.8	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1			age model and new ages look good.			OK	ok
229	Giles Lake	GILES	-75.093333	41.376111	732	access	400	-34	1631.344256	343.0524879	439.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
235	Glenboro Lake Site	GLENBORO	-99.283333	49.433333	450	access	13710	12	-225.3008043	1117.425017	270	n	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
237	Glimmerglass Lake	GLIMMER	-89.3181	46.2177	522	excel	10723	44	484.9106462	751.6487848	313.2	y			y	Linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.2"	4	0.2		rejected Ulmus decline and two rc ages.  kept linear interp model	y	y	I think I'd be more comfortable keeping the two radiocarbon dates and fitting a poly or spline.	"Rejected Ulmus, kept all other pollen and rc ages. Fit a spline, smooth=0.2"
240	Goshen Springs	GOSHEN	-86.134167	31.721111	105	access	28142	0	892.3075696	-923.1511186	63	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
241	Gould Pond	GOULD	-69.316667	44.983333	89	access	14508	-29	1953.049954	865.4252908	53.4	y			y	"linear interpolation, straight line fit (least squares)(new age model=smooth spline, smoothing=0.3)"	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		** argh.  See notes on pdf.	yy		"I agree with your decision:  keep the original 830-year correction, add in our new estimates for Tsuga and Picea, and fit a spline."	"Applied 830 year correction, kept original dates, added in the new pollen strat ages, fit a spline with smooth=0.3"
242	Graham Lake	GRAHAM	-77.35	45.183333	381	access	11620	0	1369.728987	747.5354498	228.6	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			accept Tsuga and Picea.  Reject rc dates adjacent to the pollen ages. Keep linear model		y	"This is one of a series of Bennett/Fuller sites that generally have a fairly good density of radiocarbon dates that are well-behaved and are from southern Ontario, i.e. on the Precambrian shield, with few carbonates.  For this and other  B/F sites, I lean towards keeping the original 14C dates, and not using any of our biostrat dates.  "	"OK, rejected new pollen dates, kept original rc dates and linear interp age model"
243	Grand Rapids	GRANDRAP	-98.25	53	350	access	8050	349	-144.5077185	1532.502093	210	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
244	Lac Gras	GRAS	-67.066667	52.25	530	access	7303	-31	1855.96927	1728.873444	318	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
245	Gravel Ridge	GRAVEL	-62.633333	55.033333	565	access	7287	0	2018.02762	2125.152008	339	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
246	Green Lake	GREENLK	-85.116667	44.883333	305	access	15416	200	806.7890363	623.2749251	183	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"Reject quercus and rc date next to tsuga, fit linear interp"		y	"This is a 1970's era thesis with presumably bulk-sed dates that are suspect... In chron notes, it says that bottom 2 14C dates were adjusted by 1200 years to match other sitesƒ  In this case I recommend ditching bottom two 14C dates and fitting spline or poly through remaining dates."	"OK, rejected 2 basal rc dates, accepted all other ages, fit spline with smooth=0.3"
247	Green Pond (US:New Jersey)	GREENNJ	-74.496389	41.004444	292	access	1151	-25	1687.003989	310.7037922	175.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
248	Green Pond	GREENPND	-72.5089	42.5685	80	excel	2468	-30	1794.543517	526.798007	48	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
251	Grenadier Pond	GRENADIE	-79.47	43.64	76	access	4619	-29	1247.35774	538.9820811	45.6	n		y	y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
252	Grey Islands	GREYIS	-55.516667	50.768889	104	access	11337	-37	2629.898328	1840.500725	62.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
254	Guard Lake	GUARD	-84.779	46.127	254	excel	2373	491	814.354382	772.0939909	152.4	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
255	"Water Conservation Area 3B, Gumbo Limbo Dry Head"	GUMLIMDH	-80.505556	25.773889	5	access	1872	-37	1508.822099	-1529.116586	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
256	"Water Conservation Area 3B, Gumbo Limbo Far Tail"	GUMLIMFT	-80.505556	25.774722	5	access	4650	-41	1508.806699	-1529.02321	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
257	"Water Conservation Area 3B, Gumbo Limbo Marsh"	GUMLIMM	-80.511111	25.778889	5	access	4326	-34	1508.193584	-1528.64449	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
258	"Water Conservation Area 3B, Gumbo Limbo Near Tail"	GUMLIMNT	-80.561389	25.886944	5	access	3757	131	1501.350404	-1517.32645	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
259	"Water Conservation Area 3B, Gumbo Limbo Wet Head"	GUMLIMWH	-80.506389	25.773611	5	access	4197	-43	1508.746845	-1529.161007	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
260	Hack Pond	HACK	-78.997222	37.984722	469	access	15061	0	1401.714687	-111.3872513	281.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"accept both biostrat dates, reject 1 radiocarbon, keep linear interp."			OK	ok
261	Hafichuk Site	HAFICHUK	-105.883889	50.320556	740	access	13468	12044	-666.2926333	1252.471082	444	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
262	Hams Lake	HAMSLAKE	-80.413333	43.236667	301	access	11963	-31	1184.63926	479.8887653	180.6	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"rejected picea and date near tsuga decline, kept linear interp"	y	y	Another Bennett/Fuller site from southern Ontario - do not use biostrat dates - see Graham Lake	"OK.  Followed Jacks notes/original chron, kept linear interp"
263	Hanson Marsh	HANSON	-89.675	43.433056	381	access	12436	-15	480.9882623	421.5455746	228.6	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"accept both dates, keep age model the same"			OK	ok
264	Harlock Pond	HARLOCK	-70.71	41.4041	32	excel	2307	-50	1965.077043	429.4224112	19.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
265	Lac Harriman	HARR	-65.838889	48.2375	65	access	14171	0	2079.328089	1306.400269	39	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
266	Harrie Lake	HARRIE	-66.95	52.933333	530	access	6796	-5	1839.203566	1807.059086	318	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
267	Isle au Haut - North Hollow	HAUTNOR	-68.6238	44.0786	75	excel	3753	249	2032.81675	777.376904	45	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
268	Isle au Haut - South Hollow	HAUTSOU	-68.6176	44.0403	65	excel	5011	578	2034.5538	773.1702843	39	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
269	Hawke Hills Kettle	HAWKE	-53.133333	47.322222	220	access	8115	-27	2951.463791	1543.824267	132	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
272	Hebron Lake	HEBRON	-63.033333	58.2	170	access	9011	0	1871.54861	2456.77207	102	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
273	Hell's Kitchen Lake	HELLSKIT	-89.7	46.183333	488	access	2040	2	457.5074225	745.7017043	292.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
274	Helmetta Bog	HELMETTA	-74.433333	40.383333	15	access	10602	0	1708.4013	240.4002322	9	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"rejected basal radiocarbon date, accepted picea"	y		"OK.  This is a 'southern' site, so we are relying heavily here on our benchmark sites Browns Pond and Clear Pond, but so it goes.  I trust the Picea decline over the 14C date in this case."	ok
275	Hemlock Lake	HEMLOCK	-91.1967	46.3081	412	excel	6535	-34	348.1781084	754.0494271	247.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
277	Tourbi?re de Lanoraie HENRI	HEN	-73.3	45.988889	18	access	6597	263	1639.419428	904.7571385	10.8	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1			chron is good as is			OK	ok
279	High Lake	HIGHLAKE	-76.6	44.516667	192	access	10562	0	1440.06689	681.4445715	115.2	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"rejected 1 rc date, kept linear"		y	Another Bennett/Fuller site from southern Ontario - do not use biostrat dates - see Graham Lake	"OK.  Followed Jacks notes/original chron, kept linear interp"
280	Hiscock Site	HISCOCK	-78.0681	43.0977	189	excel	12815	205	1363.983796	495.2448511	113.4	y				Linear regression and Smooth spline (smooth spline for now)	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.4"	4	0.55	53	"*this site is a mess in clam, though smooth=0.4 works slightly better.  Good candidate for Bacon.  Or keep original chron with dates averaged since there are no new pollen biostrat (for which Hiscock is not a benchmark site)"	yy	y	"Wow, an interesting case where the dates are reasonable age model is just totally out to lunch.  I agree that Bacon or a smoother spline might be better.  There appears to be a hiatus between 8ka and 1kaƒ so you might try fitting two separate age models"	"accepted all ages, introduced a hiatus at 53 (midway between two radiocarbon ages that bound the break).  Fit a smooth spline, smooth=0.55"
283	Horseshoe Lake (US:Illinois)	HORSESHA	-90.0663	38.7084	123	excel	1699	274	486.1592073	-137.0232495	73.8	n			y	2nd order polynomial	2nd degree polynomial	2	2						
285	Hostage Lake	HOSTAGE	-94.133333	46.55	368	access	3622	-30	134.7964364	775.1135008	220.8	n	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
286	Houghton Bog	HOUGHTON	-78.670278	42.541667	428	access	13876	-16	1330.646252	422.1029585	256.8	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"accept all ages, fit smooth spline."	y		OK	ok
287	Howes Prairie Marsh	HOWES	-87.072222	41.65	185	access	2240	0	698.2326101	227.6869413	111	n	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
290	Humber Pond 3	HUMBER3	-79.48	43.64	74	access	4092	-29	1246.610794	538.850541	44.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
291	Humber Pond 5	HUMBER5	-79.49	43.64	74	access	4207	-26	1245.863834	538.7190796	44.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
292	Humber Pond 7	HUMBER7	-79.5	43.65	74	access	3668	-23	1244.912161	539.7518736	44.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
295	Icehouse Pond	ICEHSMA	-69.9597	41.7988	19	excel	2083	-49	2009.278457	490.0753301	11.4	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
296	Indian Lake	INDIAN	-90.45	50.916667	383	access	10288	5821	370.5128693	1298.425735	229.8	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
297	Inglesby Lake	INGLESBY	-77.05	44.483333	167	access	10407	500	1407.897118	670.8255281	100.2	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		keep basal dates unaveraged and fit smooth spline.  Accept tsuga			OK	ok
298	Irvin Lake	IRVIN	-93.643611	47.135556	478	access	8076	-32	168.4363529	844.9844593	286.8	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.2"	4	0.2		"rejected basal rc date, kept quercus and picea"		y	Maybe keep all and fit a spline or poly?	"kept all, fit smooth spline with smooth=0.2"
301	Itasca Bison Kill Site	ITASCAMB	-95.2247	47.197	447	excel	10684	9869	55.36479946	850.3661231	268.2	n		y	y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
302	Itasca Bison Kill Site	ITASCAMC	-95.2247	47.197	447	excel	8604	7499	55.36479946	850.3661231	268.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
303	Itasca Bison Kill Site	ITASCAMD	-95.2247	47.197	447	excel	9897	4712	55.36479946	850.3661231	268.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
306	Itasca Bison Kill Site	ITASCAT2	-95.2247	47.197	447	excel	8158	6710	55.36479946	850.3661231	268.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
308	Jack Lake	JACKLAKE	-81.766667	47.316667	430	access	10146	22	1010.499134	940.2580765	258	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"rejected basal rc date, kept picea"		y	"Keep all, fit poly or spline."	"kept all, fit smooth spline with smooth=0.3"
309	Jackson Pond	JACKSON	-85.7238	37.4331	262	access	24197	-25	857.0834085	-255.797171	157.2	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"keep alnus, all other dates."			Ditch Alnus but keep other dates.  We are in the south here and away from the classic YD Alnus decline	"Rejected Alnus, kept all other dates, kept linear interpolation"
310	Jacobson Lake	JACOBSN1	-92.716944	46.416944	324	access	NA	NA	237.5890638	762.1925058	194.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			keep ulmus.			OK	ok
311	Jacobson Lake	JACOBSN2	-92.716944	46.416944	324	access	7971	18	237.5890638	762.1925058	194.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			keep ulmus			OK	ok
312	Jay Lake	JAYLAKE	-89.2804	46.2353	544	excel	10460	34	487.494802	753.9152378	326.4	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	4	0.3		"benchmark site, keep tsuga"			OK	switched to smooth spline to get rid of age reversal.
313	James Bay	JBL004	-80.2	50.22	0	access	2889	-14	1064.06543	1294.787349	0	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
314	Saint-Jean Ile d'Orl?ans	JEAN	-70.932778	46.932778	68	access	6558	143	1777.450227	1055.345627	40.8	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
315	Jemima Pond	JEMIMA	-69.9836	41.8301	3	excel	1857	-49	2006.478776	493.1283235	1.8	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
316	Jewell Site	JEWELL	-93.7	42.26	317	access	9750	1204	178.3808378	269.0174949	190.2	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"rejected 501748, accepted quercus and picea"			OK	ok
317	Joes Pond	JOES3	-58.24	48.24	100	access	12750	-18	2578.071342	1493.440524	60	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
318	Tourbi?re du lac Joncas	JON	-71.162778	47.257778	747	access	7964	119	1751.586515	1088.08846	448.2	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
320	Tourbi?re de Lanoraie JOSEPH	JOS	-73.302778	45.991944	18	access	5405	0	1639.137081	905.0596223	10.8	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.25"	4	0.25		"rejected 501777, accepted picea rise"			Waiting on ILL (Comtois)ƒ my leaning is to keep both and fit spline.	"bulk-sediment dates from the Canadian Shield, not much reason to think there are old-carbon issues.  Accept all dates and fit a spline."
321	Kanaaupscow	KAN	-76.643889	54.027778	200	access	7245	0	1210.464068	1774.099731	120	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
324	Kellys Hollow	KELLHOL1	-90.35	45.3	470	access	8206	-29	416.5786423	638.5672227	282	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			kept both new ages			OK	removed Ulmus decline because it doesnÍt change the age model much but really screws up the error
325	Kellys Hollow	KELLHOL2	-90.35	45.3	470	access	7201	-29	416.5786423	638.5672227	282	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			kept both new ages			OK	removed Ulmus decline because it doesnÍt change the age model much but really screws up the error
326	Kellners Lake	KELLNERS	-87.848056	44.238056	261	access	17047	-23	611.4428136	526.9527049	156.6	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			picea decline lines up well with existing dates.  keep all dates.			OK	ok
327	Kennys Pond	KENNYS	-52.713889	47.590278	70	access	9533	-32	2964.380635	1585.316263	42	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
328	Lac K?nogami	KENOGAMI	-71.566944	48.365833	166	access	8248	145	1690.431787	1206.975113	99.6	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
329	Kenosee Lake	KENOSEE	-102.3	49.816667	746	access	5503	61	-429.0804267	1172.824662	447.6	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
331	Kerr Lake	KERRMI	-89.274	46.2443	524	excel	8106	862	487.8829923	755.0082399	314.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
332	Marais de Keswick	KESV	-79.512778	44.195833	221	access	4324	47	1232.793285	603.1297404	132.6	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
333	Kettle Lake	KETTLE	-103.6241	48.607	605	excel	12830	-45	-530.5123007	1037.66061	363	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	4	0.375		benchmark site for all biostrat dates.  Keep all dates			OK	changed to smooth spline to get rid of age reversal
335	Kilbride Swamp	KILBRIDE	-79.913056	43.466111	265	excel	8360	-51	1217.721904	512.9707441	159	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
336	Kimble Pond	KIMBLE	-93.8383	44.2201	311	excel	12295	-48	162.3742915	500.3758679	186.6	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			rejected rc in favor of ulmus date		y	"Here I would reject Ulmus - this is a well-dated recordƒ in fact, I thought it was one of our benchmarks?"	"Not a benchmark.  Rejected ulmus, kept picea and all rc dates.  Changed ""every"" in clam to ""every=0.25"" to get rid of 1 minor age reversal near top of core."
337	Kinsman Pond	KINSMAN	-71.733333	44.133333	1140	access	9660	0	1805.681998	720.6489869	684	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			all dates look great. Keep chron as it is			OK	ok
338	Kirchner Marsh	KIRCHNR1	-93.1202	44.7724	286	access	13460	171	214.3165449	567.0577217	171.6	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.2"	4	0.2		"kept all new biostrat dates, rejected 1 rc date.  Applied a smooth spline, though linear also works ok."			OK	ok
341	Kotiranta Lake	KOTIRANT	-92.62	46.72	386	access	16322	150	243.326524	798.1915808	231.6	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new date looks great.			OK	ok
342	Kroening Lake	KROENING	-88.8689	44.8061	292	excel	4321	-33	529.9828696	587.7279904	175.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
344	Kylen Lake	KYLENLK	-91.8	47.35	485	access	18916	9439	299.0312985	874.8126368	291	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
345	Lake Lacawac	LACAWAC	-75.292778	41.381944	443	access	712	-24	1615.881833	340.3089824	265.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
346	Lac Colin	LACCOLIN	-70.3	46.716667	658	access	12976	56	1828.058299	1042.782694	394.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
348	Lac Louis	LACLOUIS	-79.116667	47.2875	300	access	10153	52	1197.411099	967.7255308	180	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
349	Lac ? Magie	LACMAGIE	-66.079167	44.263889	60	access	13993	10462	2208.933493	855.2204585	36	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"this site is a benchmark site, so keep all ages"			OK	ok
351	Lake Sixteen	LAKE16	-84.316667	45.6	216	access	12243	2340	855.3933421	714.3715778	129.6	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			rejected 502056 in favor of picea decline			"OK.  And weirdly, I looked up the Futyma and Miller 1986 paper and couldn't find any mention of the older two 14C dates in it.  This strengthens our use of biostrat dates instead."	ok
352	Lake A	LAKEA	-105.725	53.2375	440	access	13264	0	-620.7302969	1590.26747	264	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
354	Lake Ann	LAKEANNF	-93.6875	45.425	291	access	9973	905	170.2261435	642.9950572	174.6	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			kept picea decline			OK	ok
355	Lake B	LAKEB	-106.079167	53.8	553	access	11993	0	-636.3232462	1657.554727	331.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
356	Lake BI2	LAKEBI2	-76.378333	57.116667	210	access	8089	0	1153.880837	2124.930367	126	n			y	3rd degree polynomial (least squares)	3rd order polynomial	2	3						
357	Lake BN7	LAKEBN7	-73.516667	55.009167	395	access	6728	-40	1375.963676	1927.444367	237	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
359	Lake CH2	LAKECH2	-74.583333	49.683333	830	access	8328	0	1450.843483	1307.486248	498	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
360	Lake EC1	LAKEEC1	-75.1	56.283333	250	access	7546	0	1248.683924	2048.12137	150	n			y	3rd degree polynomial (least squares)	3rd order polynomial	2	3						
361	Lake EC2	LAKEEC2	-74.945	56.023333	300	access	6349	54	1264.354757	2021.110886	180	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
362	Lake GB1	LAKEGB1	-75.248889	55.110833	325	access	6382	-5	1269.17952	1914.692338	195	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
363	Lake GB2	LAKEGB2	-75.283333	56.1	300	access	7235	0	1242.459488	2025.214404	180	n			y	3rd degree polynomial (least squares)	3rd order polynomial	2	3						
364	Lake LB1	LAKELB1	-75.616667	57.916667	200	access	6931	0	1178.601676	2223.167363	120	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
365	Lake LR1	LAKELR1	-75.25	58.583333	170	access	7559	83	1183.106596	2301.310637	102	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
366	Lake LR3	LAKELR3	-75.245	58.578333	160	access	6362	0	1183.509537	2300.822834	96	n			y	straight-line fit (least squares)	1st order polynomial	2	1						
367	Lake LT1	LAKELT1	-75.15	58.141667	150	access	6767	0	1199.597052	2253.890394	90	n			y	3rd degree polynomial (least squares)	3rd order polynomial	2	3						
368	Lake Mary	LAKEMARY	-89.9	46.25	488	access	10661	200	442.497543	752.6078957	292.8	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.25"	4	0.25		"accepted picea decline, rejected basal date."	y	y	"Original 14C date was bulk-sed, but is younger than the Picea biostrat age.  If hardwater effect was in operation, we'd expect the 14C to be older than the Picea biostrat.  Given this, I recommend we use both dates and fit a poly or spline."	"accepted all dates, fit smooth spline"
369	Lake QC	LAKEQC	-80.698333	46.828333	333	access	9357	0	1094.968905	895.2022347	199.8	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"accepted picea decline, rejected basal date."	y	y	Same as above (Lake Mary)	"accepted all dates, fit smooth spline"
370	Lake Six	LAKESIX	-81.316667	48.4	305	access	7694	25	1022.496726	1071.288106	183	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
371	L'Anse aux Meadows Site	LAN17	-55.55	51.573333	5	access	2389	15	2588.902093	1925.282012	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
372	Langdale Pond	LANGDALE	-83.195	30.641667	58	access	8470	0	1173.539395	-1015.243562	34.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
373	Tourbi?re de Lanoraie STJEAN	LANSTJE	-73.216944	46	20	access	5460	0	1644.989755	907.4706212	12	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks great			OK	ok
374	Leading Tickles	LEADINGT	-55.473056	49.471389	105	access	15266	-32	2695.688056	1703.145331	63	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
375	Lac ? L?onard	LEO	-65.812778	49.207778	17	access	9694	523	2045.312405	1415.434337	10.2	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
376	Levi Pond	LEVI	-72.228056	44.265278	501	excel	3188	-44	1765.782844	726.4278115	300.6	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
378	Lily Lake (US:Minnesota)	LILYLAKE	-92.825	45.05	258	access	12947	0	235.1791452	600.5470338	154.8	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"accepted ulmus and picea, rejected 502208 and 502209"	y	y	Recommend keeping all and fitting poly or spline	"accepted all dates, fit smooth spline"
379	Lily Lake (US:Michigan)	LILYMI	-89.0881	47.9134	301	excel	10660	991	486.998965	952.3759703	180.6	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks great			OK	ok
380	Lily Warwick	LILYWAR	-72.3371	42.6882	269	excel	1240	-37	1803.900519	543.7697352	161.4	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
381	Lima Bog	LIMABOG	-88.8285	42.8003	302	excel	11744	-20	550.8976601	351.5520535	181.2	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			rejected basal date in favor of pollen biostrat ages. Keep linear model			OK	ok
382	Linsley Pond	LINSLEY	-72.7824	41.3192	9	excel	764	-22	1809.860571	378.4575144	5.4	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
383	Little Bass Lake	LITTBASS	-93.6	47.283333	391	access	12500	25	171.1117406	862.4899524	234.6	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"I have accepted Quercus and Picea, rejected the two nearby dates, and fit linear interpolation"	y	y	Recommend keeping all and fitting poly or spline	"accepted all dates, fit smooth spline"
384	Little Bolton	LITTLEBO	-71.585	42.4239	99	excel	1183	-44	1867.938146	528.099421	59.4	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
386	Little Mirror Lake	LITTLEM	-71.6077	42.5253	73	excel	884	-35	1863.190561	539.2407849	43.8	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
389	Lake Annie	LKANNIE	-81.416667	27.2	34	access	47322	0	1395.926824	-1382.637679	20.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
390	Lake of the Clouds (US:Minnesota)	LKCLDSH	-91.116667	48	462	access	10800	393	343.6973594	953.6743761	277.2	y			y	1st order polynomial	1st order polynomial	2	1		ulmus decline lines up really well with existing age model.  keep in the core.			OK.  And wow - I'd forgotten how many dates this one has.  Add it as a benchmark site (but without redoing all analyses)?	ok
391	Lake Hope Simpson	LKHOPE	-56.433333	52.45	295	access	12200	222	2494.246578	1994.954206	177	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
392	Little Lake (CA:Nova Scotia)	LLAKE	-63.938889	44.668056	40	access	13334	12553	2345.233885	951.8753809	24	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
394	Lockport Gulf Section	LOCKPORT	-78.716667	43.166667	109	access	12557	10474	1313.731061	494.0965384	65.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
396	Lonesome Lake	LONESOME	-71.701111	44.14	831	access	12206	481	1807.827145	722.0254339	498.6	y			y	least squares polynomial (2nd order)	2nd degree polynomial	2	2		accept all ages and fit a 2nd order poly			OK	ok
397	Longswamp	LONGSWMP	-75.666667	40.483333	192	access	14458	0	1609.74045	230.3299109	115.2	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		2 dates rejected originally- kept them rejected.  Rejected another date (502296) and accepted Quercus rise	y	y	"keep all, fit poly or spline"	"kept all rc dates and pollen dates, except rc dates originally rejected by authors.  Fit smooth spline"
399	Lorraine Lake	LORRAINE	-86.4811	46.1461	218	excel	6397	-33	691.0526273	760.8211128	130.8	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
401	Lost Moose Core 128	LOSTMOOS	-94.219167	57.588056	110	excel	4838	-34	104.4627635	2059.677637	66	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
402	Lost Pond	LOSTPOND	-71.251389	44.246944	625	access	15441	20	1837.267117	742.8917374	375	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new ages look great			OK	ok
403	Lake Louise	LOUISE-D	-83.258333	30.725	49	access	9306	0	1166.479062	-1006.47743	29.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
404	Lake Louise (CA:Manitoba)	LOUISEMB	-97.2275	49.041944	240	excel	1453	-47	-84.84087916	1068.049871	144	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
405	Lovesick Lake (core 1)	LOVESIC1	-78.194167	44.566667	242	excel	6577	-50	1322.086451	664.0157479	145.2	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks great			OK	ok
407	Lovesick Lake (core 3)	LOVESIC3	-78.194167	44.566667	242	excel	10391	-50	1322.086451	664.0157479	145.2	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"three basal ages, only one of them can be correct.  Accepted picea decline age.  1) in the middle of the 3 dates; 2) of the biostrat ages, tends to be most reliable"	y		OK	ok
408	Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge Site 1 (EPA Site 7)	LOXAHAT1	-80.415556	26.481111	5	access	1471	-39	1504.339397	-1448.303889	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
409	Little Dollar Lake	LTDOLLAR	-85.306	46.186	258	excel	6616	19	775.489905	774.5958101	154.8	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
410	Site 10	LXSITE10	-71.654444	58.314444	0	excel	1677	-45	1391.638452	2320.650156	0	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
411	Site 4	LXSITE4	-75.284444	57.834722	0	excel	3506	-45	1199.520293	2218.265637	0	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
412	Site 5	LXSITE5	-75.284444	57.834722	0	excel	4318	-45	1199.520293	2218.265637	0	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
413	Lynn Lake	LYNNLAKE	-101.041944	56.841667	340	access	7433	1448	-300.1525372	1981.717469	204	n		y	y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
416	Tourbi?re du lac Malbaie	MAL	-70.976389	47.597222	818	access	8148	305	1753.980691	1130.190888	490.8	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
417	Mansell Pond	MANSELL	-68.733333	45.041667	58	access	9913	-30	1992.619941	884.1813032	34.8	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.4"	4	0.4		*not sure about my decision on this chron.  See notes	y	y	"Mansell Pond is very close to Gould Pond (see above) which has a 830yr correction applied.  No correction was applied here by authors but they note that their upper 14C date is too old relative to Ambrosia rise.  What if we applied the 830 year correction from Gould Pond to all 14C dates to this site, then used all 14C dates?"	"applying the correction works perfectly!  Tsuga and Picea line up with the existing dates.  One age may be an outlier (502442), but I fit a smooth spline to the ages, smooth=0.4"
419	Maplehurst Lake	MAPLHRST	-80.659722	43.225	300	access	14364	30	1166.300117	475.472906	180	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"accept picea, reject 502453"				accepted both and fit a spline.
420	Lac Marcotte	MARC	-71.422778	47.077778	503	access	12613	0	1739.109444	1062.783519	301.8	n			y	2nd degree polynomial (least squares)	2nd degree polynomial	2	2						
421	Mark Pond	MARKPOND	-89.613611	51.841111	348	excel	7885	-30	418.9918638	1409.819918	208.8	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
423	Lac Martyne	MARTYNE	-64.833333	56.783333	365	access	6789	40	1825.151413	2269.83259	219	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
424	Mashapaug Pond	MASHPAUG	-71.433333	41.783333	12	access	4205	-17	1898.676746	457.9378495	7.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
425	Wapizagonke	MAU3	-73.030556	46.726389	230	access	11095	880	1637.606346	993.9772369	138	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
426	Sud du Lac du Noyer	MAU5	-72.837778	46.787778	270	access	10907	260	1649.324293	1004.351424	162	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
427	Mayflower Lake	MAYFLOWR	-66.070833	45.302778	50	access	13822	12625	2171.406508	972.1239032	30	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
428	Mayflower Lake	MAYFLWON	-79.213889	45.391389	189	excel	6593	-23	1230.021968	746.1336376	113.4	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new date looks great			OK	ok
429	McCarston's Lake	MCCAR	-80.09	45.05	433	access	9727	-28	1173.183009	695.2873004	259.8	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new date looks great			OK	ok
431	McDonald Lake	MCDONALD	-86.8031	46.0442	232	excel	6126	-33	668.9164195	746.5359109	139.2	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"tsuga decline trending older than rc dates.  Rejected two rc dates, accepted tsuga."	y	y	"My leanint here is to accept the 14C dates(and reject Tsuga biostrat), but this is a toss-up."	"ok, accepted all ages except Tsuga."
440	Lake Mendota	MENDOTAC	-89.416667	43.1	257	access	13262	76	503.3340376	383.6108536	154.2	n	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
441	Lake Mendota	MENDOTAD	-89.416667	43.1	257	access	12500	78	503.3340376	383.6108536	154.2	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"since quercus is right in line with age model, reject picea, accept quercus."	y	y	These were bulk-sed dates and were originally checked by Winkler et al 1986 for consistency with Devils Lakeƒ which we now know to be in error.  So dates are very likely affected by hardwater effect.  Recommend keeping Picea and ditching Quercus.  Not sure whether to reject other 14C dates or adjust them basedon on difference between Picea and nearest 14Cadate.	"Offset all ages by 1700 years, except the top date, which was offset by 1500 years to be consistent with core top and Ambrosia rise.  1700 year offset is based on the Picea decline age.  Rejected Quercus age, kept linear interp age model"
442	Mermaid Bog	MERMAID	-63.025	46.25	15	access	9571	-26	2345.698156	1150.496598	9	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
444	Miller Woods Pond 21	MILLER21	-87.274	41.612	181	excel	2073	2	682.9094608	221.7477708	108.6	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
445	Miller Woods Pond 32	MILLER32	-87.284	41.607	182	excel	1883	47	682.18328	221.0876531	109.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
446	Miller Woods Pond 44	MILLER44	-87.293	41.604	182	excel	2349	532	681.5133536	220.6700465	109.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
447	Miller Woods Pond 51	MILLER51	-87.288	41.602	186	excel	3180	0	681.9252914	220.4707537	111.6	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
448	Lac Mimi	MIMI	-70.375833	47.496944	423	access	12743	1060	1798.215147	1130.037429	253.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
450	Lake Minnie	MINNIEO	-95.01	47.24	429	access	8995	1	70.64323046	855.581145	257.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new ages look great			OK	ok
451	Makepeace Cedar Swamp	MKPEACEA	-70.7505	41.9482	40	excel	13376	7	1945.087568	490.5903997	24	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"site author originally rejected these two ages as too young in relation to associated pollen strat dates.  Based on our data, that seems true for this age but not for the shallower age.  keep this rejected, but allow other age."	y		OK	ok
452	Makepeace Cedar Swamp	MKPEACEB	-70.7505	41.9482	40	excel	4311	-14	1945.087568	490.5903997	24	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
453	Makepeace Cedar Swamp	MKPEACED	-70.7505	41.9482	40	excel	9856	-1	1945.087568	490.5903997	24	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new date looks great			OK	ok
454	Mohawk Pond	MOHAWK	-73.283333	41.816667	360	access	32073	224	1757.624135	426.0766311	216	y			y	5th order polynomial	5th order polynomial	2	5		"New dates line up almost exactly with existing ages, so keep all.  And this isn't even a benchmark site!"			OK	ok
455	Lac Montagnais	MONTAGNA	-71.175	47.907778	800	access	9502	229	1730.902643	1161.891993	480	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
456	Moon Lake	MOONLAKE	-98.158333	46.8575	444	access	13659	-35	-155.0286567	811.8462807	266.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			benchmark site. accept all ages.			OK	ok
458	Moraine Lake	MORAINE	-58.05	52.266667	385	access	10712	136	2406.293384	1933.552688	231	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
459	Mordsger Lake	MORDSGER	-94.25	51.383333	400	access	10156	30	115.8802833	1343.265768	240	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
460	Morrison Lake	MORRISON	-88.6222	46.1626	470	excel	2910	-20	535.8213423	748.9064921	282	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
461	MS7812X Island Lake	MS7812X	-66.178611	47.831389	290	excel	11341	6	2071.496558	1253.483172	174	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
462	Pye Lake	MS9011	-62.085556	44.978056	5	excel	13508	-40	2462.309037	1033.313158	3	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
464	Mud Creek Site 1	MUDCRK1	-80.604722	25.219722	5	access	1900	-42	1509.419118	-1592.751403	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
465	Mud Lake (US:Florida)	MUDLAKE	-81.866667	29.3	15	access	9027	0	1317.405817	-1151.007415	9	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
466	Mud Lake (US:Michigan)	MUDLKMI	-88.305556	47.134722	189	excel	9702	-49	549.4651578	865.103792	113.4	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			benchmark site for ulmus.  accept new age.			OK	ok
468	Mud Lake (US:Minnesota:Hubbard)	MUDLKMN2	-94.75	46.866667	424	access	2863	-30	89.77584109	811.7551185	254.4	n	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
469	Mud Pond (USA:Maine)	MUDPOND	-68.0871	44.6342	104	excel	13476	6305	2052.464644	851.8388247	62.4	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			benchmark site for quercus.  accept this age.			OK	ok
471	Muscotah Marsh	MUSCOTAA	-95.513333	39.53	280	access	27707	58	39.40239654	-55.3263171	168	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks great.  keep in chron.			OK	ok
473	Myrtle Lake	MYRTLE	-93.383333	47.983333	393	access	12830	28	184.2778012	945.3993463	235.8	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"rejected age at 792.5 cm depth, kept both pollen, kept linear"			"OK.  A peatland site, so plausible that younger carbon mixed in from above."	ok
474	Nedlouc	NED	-71.65	57.65	330	access	4158	81	1411.000545	2247.946333	198	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
476	Nelson Lake	NELSONMI	-85.3764	46.2307	251	excel	7527	-46	769.815922	779.2671449	150.6	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
477	Nelson Pond	NELSONPD	-92.683333	46.4	335	access	8029	6386	240.0904224	760.2778887	201	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
480	Nichols Brook Site	NICHOLS2	-78.478889	42.544722	438	access	14369	10228	1345.10874	425.1589498	262.8	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			picea decline fits right in.  accept all ages.			OK	ok
481	Nina Lake	NINA	-81.5	46.6	380	access	10842	20	1042.169353	859.5473129	228	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		reject basal rc date.  accept picea decline age.	y	y	This is an area where we are basically extrapolating our spruce decline agesƒ. I recommend either ditching Spruce decline or keeping both and fitting a poly or spline.	"ok.  No reason to accept or reject either, so fit a spline to split the difference."
482	No Bottom Pond	NOBOTTOM	-70.208333	41.283333	6	access	16536	-35	2006.933359	426.1838516	3.6	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
483	North Pond	NORTHPND	-73.05	42.65	586	access	13180	20	1751.719036	526.0214167	351.6	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.4"	4	0.4		"many dates were averaged in original chron, kept separate here. One date rejected and fit a smooth spline."	y		OK	ok
484	North Round Pond	NORTHRND	-72.4502	42.8492	317	excel	1651	-43	1790.778607	560.0665593	190.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
485	"Water Conservation Area 3B, Nuthouse Far Tail"	NUTHSFT	-80.556667	25.885556	5	access	3652	-18	1501.83112	-1517.407329	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
486	"Water Conservation Area 3B, Nuthouse Head"	NUTHSH	-80.5125	25.889167	5	access	2405	-39	1506.021285	-1516.30166	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
487	Nutt Lake	NUTTLAKE	-79.45	45.216667	305	access	11047	-34	1216.483936	722.7605369	183	y				2nd degree polynomial (least squares)	2nd degree polynomial	2	2		"Not sure whether to just reject Quercus, or reject Quercus plus 2 basal radiocarbon dates.  Either way, keep model the same (2nd deg poly)"	yy	y	Another Bennett/Fuller site from southern Ontario - do not use biostrat dates - see Graham Lake	"ok.  Kept all rc dates, rejected all pollen ages"
488	Northwest River Pond	NWRIVER	-60.166667	53.516667	29	access	5476	38	2225.058768	2016.433932	17.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
489	Lake Ojibway	OJIBWAY	-88.6024	48.1053	256	excel	9811	560	519.3903748	977.5034053	153.6	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			benchmark site for ulmus.  accept new age.			OK	ok
490	Lake West Okoboji	OKOBOJI	-95.2	43.333333	426	access	15465	5	60.98036937	393.963682	255.6	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"rejected quercus, accepted other ages"	y		OK.  Bulk-seds dates from Iowaƒ	ok
491	Old Field	OLDFIELD	-89.833333	37.116667	97	access	9810	5868	517.3914261	-322.6463471	58.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
492	Oliver Pond	OLIVER	-89.323889	48.422222	250	access	9182	-24	466.1956017	1010.981854	150	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			ulmus age looks ok.  Accepted	y		OK	ok
494	Ondris Pond	ONDRISPD	-94.4	46.35	363	access	870	-15	115.9402691	751.1524708	217.8	n	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
497	Lake O' Pines	OPINES	-89.2536	46.1415	514	excel	12479	-39	490.2234284	743.004694	308.4	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"rejected picea, accepted ulmus"	y		OK	ok
498	Otisville	OTISVILL	-74.5162	41.4749	230	excel	17386	-40	1672.993226	364.4883845	138	y			y	Linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.35"	4	0.35		"accepted both pollen ages, rejected 71071 as too young."			Why reject 71071 and not 71070?  Perhaps keep both and fit a spline or poly	"kept all ages, fit a smooth spline (smooth=0.35)"
499	Otter Pond	OTTER	-72.5318	42.655	107	excel	835	-42	1790.325103	536.2757038	64.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
501	Lac Ouellet	OUEL	-68.943889	47.532778	300	access	12391	118	1894.8461	1161.993667	180	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
502	Panther Run Pond	PANTHER	-77.416667	40.8	634	access	13554	0	1465.781479	238.5367079	380.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new date looks great.			OK	ok
503	Paradise Lake	PARADISE	-57.75	53.05	180	access	11235	0	2388.455733	2025.10272	108	n		y	y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
504	Parrott's Pond	PARROTT	-76.7	44.22	74	access	4529	-25	1439.836605	645.5886246	44.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
505	Pasacaco Pond	PASACACO	-71.45	41.516667	3	access	1180	-17	1905.484264	427.1543483	1.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
507	Pass Lake	PASSLAKE	-88.74	48.56	250	access	10335	0	505.6510596	1030.154427	150	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"benchmark site for Ulmus, so keep this date in the chron."			OK	ok
508	Lac Patricia	PATRICIA	-64.68	56.67	538	access	5583	-2	1838.000752	2260.550208	322.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
509	Patschke Bog	PATSCHKE	-97.116667	30.366667	142	access	20577	179	-103.0229525	-1125.793932	85.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
510	Fort Bragg (core PAW2)	PAW2	-79.09	35.174167	54	excel	10158	-50	1452.669323	-437.3457049	32.4	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
511	Pawelski Farm	PAWELSKI	-74.4172	41.3458	122	excel	15835	-44	1684.010762	351.3852498	73.2	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			Only one of the pollen ages can be correct.  Chose Picea because usually fairly reliable and using that would mean more linear sed rate.	y		OK	ok
512	Paynter Marsh	PAYNTER	-78.34	44.1	188	access	NA	NA	1321.600525	607.7859411	112.8	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"In revised chron, rejected the date at 126cm in favor of Tsuga decline at 120cm."		y	"This is another southern Canada site where I think we have few benchmarks nearby.  My leaning is to keep the 14C, reject the Tsuga.  Have requested ILL - Yu"	"Site on the Canadian Shield so bulk-sed dates prob.  Rejected Tsuga,rejected basal date (which was a sed stratigraphic age), kept all others.  Linear interp is fine."
513	Peatsah Section	PEATSAH	-79.82	43.33	92	access	13865	13294	1227.430202	498.3147316	55.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			Accepted Picea.			OK	ok
514	Pecker Pond	PECKER	-71.9614	42.7168	370	excel	1307	-39	1831.081857	554.2463676	222	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
515	Peggy Lake	PEGGY	-92	49.48	470	access	7957	-14	274.2202242	1124.794179	282	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
516	Penegor Lake	PENEGOR	-88.859	46.6164	437	excel	9567	-35	514.624358	801.0166268	262.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
518	Perch Lake	PERCH	-77.370833	46.035833	160	excel	11307	-10	1348.554859	846.0070461	96	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age lines up perfectly with the chron			OK	ok
519	Perch Lake (CA:Manitoba)	PERCHDUC	-100.898889	51.651389	701	access	6063	-14	-322.6464714	1381.874317	420.6	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
520	Lac Petel	PETEL	-66.266667	50.55	270	access	8366	19	1966.956356	1555.630542	162	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
521	Peterson Slough	PETERSL	-95.316667	46.966667	460	access	2804	-30	48.99337157	823.1404748	276	n	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
523	Pickerel Lake (US:South Dakota)	PICKEREL	-97.33	45.5	395	access	12516	0	-97.78522038	650.4657295	237	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			rejected basal radiocarbon age in favor of picea decline.	y		OK	ok
524	Piermont Marsh	PIERMONT	-73.909	41.036	0	excel	1305	-50	1731.399724	324.9222174	0	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	4	0.375						switched to smooth spline to get rid of age reversals
525	Pilot Mound Site	PILOTMND	-93.9	42.16	352	access	10424	343	163.1338516	256.8442399	211.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
526	Pine Lake	PINELAKE	-113.406667	52.114444	890	excel	4063	-43	-1130.626068	1531.705013	534	n			y	3rd order polynomial		2	3						
527	Pine Lake	PINEWI	-88.5717	45.2635	390	excel	12565	-26	547.7953467	643.3099615	234	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			Ulmus has a huge error range here and doesnêt add much to the chron because it's in line with picea and other dates.  Removed Ulmus from chron.			OK	ok
528	Pinhook Bog	PINHOOK	-86.849	41.616	243	excel	13883	-13	716.024075	225.3540094	145.8	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			picea age looks great.			OK	ok
529	Pink Lake	PINKLAKE	-75.808333	45.469444	162	access	12335	-30	1474.158332	803.7602098	97.2	y				linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"keep tsuga and picea.  not sure about alnus.  Reject alnus?  or just end chron at picea?  Also, the previously outlying date in red doesn't look like much of an outlier now, so accept this date."	yy	y	"Reject Alnus, keep Picea & Tsuga, keep basal date."	"accepted all ages except alnus, kep linear interp model."
530	Pitcher Bog	PITCHER	-79.98	44.82	220	access	3741	-28	1185.788593	669.8598075	132	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
532	Lake Pleasant	PLEASANT	-72.5103	42.564	80	excel	1173	-41	1794.569194	526.2559429	48	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
533	Lac Pluvieux	PLU	-69.352778	47.843889	180	access	7341	63	1856.799449	1189.119731	108	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
534	Pogonia Bog Pond	POGONIA	-93.633333	45.033333	292	access	12988	-24	175.3678949	596.8279454	175.2	y	y		y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		rejected 504514 in favor of pollen biostrat ages		y?	OK.  Might also adjust the bottom 14C date by the difference between Picea and date 504514.  This is a Minnesota bulk-sed date and so the 14C ages are likely affected by hardwater.	"ok.  The picea age at 1790 cm depth indicated an offset of 1300 years.  Increased res correction for 2 bottom dates to 1300 years, accepted all rc and pollen ages, fit smooth spline through the dates."
535	Poland Spring Pond	POLAND	-70.35	44.033333	94	access	14289	-28	1909.321117	736.3415554	56.4	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.35		"rejected quercus and the radiocarbon age here, accepted picea and alnus ages."				accepted all pollen ages and the radiocarbon dates (except the date rejected near core top by authors).  Fit a smooth spline.
536	Pond Mills Pond	PONDMILL	-81.25	42.916667	274	access	7926	3	1127.439686	432.345985	164.4	n	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
537	Porqui Pond	PORQUI2	-79.78	44.93	188	access	8265	-9	1198.235197	685.1868886	112.8	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks great			OK	ok
538	Portage Lake	PORTAGE	-94.113333	47.081389	396	access	10985	13	134.9924552	837.8436019	237.6	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"accepted Picea, rejected 502993 age."	y	y	Another unpublished Jock McAndrews recordƒ  might be best here to accept all and fit a poly or spline.  	"ok.  Accepted all ages, fit a spline with default (0.3) smoothing"
539	Portage Marsh	PORTAGE1	-87.2225	41.576111	189	access	11413	3393	687.3203934	217.8987367	113.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new ages look great and support original decision to flag other dates as outliers.				ok
540	Portage Marsh	PORTAGE2	-87.2225	41.576111	189	access	2822	1195	687.3203934	217.8987367	113.4	n			y	linear interpolation with extrapolation to sediment surface	Linear interpolation	1							
541	Potts Mountain Pond	POTTSMTN	-80.133333	37.6	840	access	12814	77	1316.49924	-172.2457496	504	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
542	Preston Lake	PRESTON	-79.372778	43.988056	320	excel	4106	-30	1247.439914	580.7752698	192	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
544	Prien Lake	PRIEND	-93.2673	30.2043	0	excel	5247	-41	252.6284005	-1141.508861	0	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
546	Protection Bog	PROTECTN	-78.466667	42.622222	430	access	9936	-17	1344.351982	434.3351441	258	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		Rejected Quercus and a rc date near Tsuga.  Kept linear interpolation		y	Reject Quercus but keep the 14C date near Tsuga decline.  Fit a poly or spline.	"accepted all ages but quercus, fit spline with smooth=0.3"
547	Point Escuminac	PTESCUMI	-64.8	47.075	6	access	12747	0	2192.688196	1199.866102	3.6	n		y	y	fit a least squares polynomial	2nd degree polynomial	2	2						
548	Powers Fort Swale	PWFTSWAL	-90.583333	36.6	91	access	20666	-35	458.0032757	-387.059821	54.6	y				linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"Not sure what to do here.  The new ages are consistently younger, indicating some problematic radiocarbon ages."	yy		"We are in Missouri here, pretty far beyond the reach of our benchmarks.  This is also the land of Picea critchfieldii.  So ditch biostrat dates here and just keep the 14C dates."	"ok.  Ditched all new pollen ages, kept dates in original age model"
550	Quag Pond	QUAG	-71.9565	42.5676	332	excel	930	-44	1835.871413	537.2723642	199.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
551	Qually Pond	QUALLY	-96.1998	47.6849	354	excel	13420	1566	-14.14675608	907.6943038	212.4	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			keep both new ages (at same depth) to increase error at that point.	y		OK	ok
553	Quicksand Pond	QUICKSND	-84.865278	34.326389	285	access	23596	0	971.0352867	-609.2721919	171	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
554	Quillin Site	QUILLIN	-81.966667	41	305	access	16421	4259	1106.469264	200.0659966	183	y				3rd order polynomial	3rd order polynomial	2	3		** quercus rise age is much older than other ages around this depth.  the default age model (3rd order poly) takes this into account and splits between the ages.  keep it as it is? 	yy		"OK (yes, keep Querc and the poly)"	"ok, kept all ages and age model"
555	Radtke Lake	RADTKE	-88.1	43.4	274	access	13176	0	600.8356154	426.6361486	164.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks great			OK	ok
556	Rivi?re-aux-Feuilles 1	RAF1	-72.066944	58.232778	205	access	6009	564	1370.871738	2305.709556	123	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
557	Rivi?re-aux-Feuilles 2	RAF2	-71.95	58.216944	225	access	5619	492	1377.875467	2305.672194	135	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
558	Tourbi?re de la Rivi?re-aux-Feuilles	RAFT	-72.066944	58.232778	200	access	5692	0	1370.871738	2305.709556	120	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
559	Ramsay Lake	RAMSAYLK	-76.1	45.6	200	access	12702	-30	1449.96619	814.3425355	120	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new ages look great.			OK	ok
560	Rattle Lake	RATTLE	-92.7	49.35	460	access	12958	0	226.7849562	1107.674802	276	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.25"	4	0.25		"removed rc date at 1243.5cm depth, accepted alnus."	y	y	add back the 14C date and fit the spline	"accepted all ages, fit spline with smooth=0.25"
561	Saint-Raymond	RAY	-71.807778	46.891944	160	access	8833	139	1718.000697	1034.556828	96	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
585	Vall?e de l'Albion	REDRIVER	-71.325	45.670833	320	access	12794	166	1788.622235	904.0636812	192	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new ages look great.			OK	ok
587	Reidel Lake	REIDEL	-95.284167	46.211944	443	access	13471	-31	51.99623195	734.0688266	265.8	y	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			ulmus and radiocarbon date are almost identical through here.  use radiocarbon in favor of ulmus.			OK	ok
589	Rhule Fen	RHULEFEN	-85.741667	39.953611	268	access	14425	10888	823.5417784	39.12998846	160.8	y				linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			rejected 1 radiocarbon age.  Should I also reject basal rc age?	yy		"yes, also reject the basal 14C date.  A Ohio bulk-sed siteƒ"	"Rejected two basal radiocarbon dates, accepted picea age."
590	Rice Lake (US:North Dakota)	RICELAKE	-101.530278	48.008056	620	access	10807	1327	-389.1264708	957.1228358	372	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		accepted ulmus age and also the basal date (previously rejected).  rejected 503230.	y	y	OK with Ulmus and adding back the basal date.  Recommend keeping the 503230 date and fitting a poly or spline	"dates at 1047, 1265, 1665, 1934, 2015 and 2030 were previously rejected.  Kept all these rejected except basal date at 2030, kept Ulmus and all other dates, fit spline with smooth=0.3"
592	Rice Lake	RICEMNB	-95.575	46.922222	443	access	1877	-15	30.49517651	817.7876033	265.8	y	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks fine.			OK	ok
594	Rice Lake (marsh core 2) (CA:Ontario)	RICEMSH2	-78.178889	44.198056	186	excel	4128	-27	1331.349654	621.4282169	111.6	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
595	Rice Lake (marsh core 3)	RICEMSH3	-78.178889	44.198056	186	excel	11640	4640	1331.349654	621.4282169	111.6	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new ages look fine.			OK	ok
596	Rice Lake (CA:Ontario)	RICEON	-78.044167	44.266111	186	excel	6965	-23	1339.779521	631.2274978	111.6	y			y	Linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		rejected one rc age in favor of tsuga decline age.		y	recommend keeping both and fitting spline/poly	"kept all previous ages (except basal rc date, which was rejected by original authors as well).  Fit a smooth spline."
597	Rife Swamp	RIFESWMP	-79.983056	43.471389	277	excel	10418	-50	1212.368885	512.6884967	166.2	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks fine.			OK	ok
598	R Lake	RILEY	-84.558333	54.305556	147	access	7391	7	714.8986491	1725.440794	88.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
599	L'Anse aux Meadows Road Cut Bog	ROADCUT	-55.53	51.6	0	access	7175	-2	2588.812789	1928.665675	0	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
600	Lac ? Robin	ROBIN	-65.266944	48.051944	50	access	10763	506	2124.344636	1298.337503	30	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
601	Robinson's Pond	ROBPOND	-58.8	48.26	32	access	13001	-11	2540.935263	1480.495049	19.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
602	Lac des Roches Moutonn?es	ROCHMOUT	-64.816667	56.766667	410	access	5800	519	1826.706532	2268.353043	246	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
603	Rockyhock Bay	ROCKYHOC	-76.683333	36.166667	6	access	29980	60	1633.201146	-284.0123377	3.6	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
604	Rogers Lake	ROGERSLK	-72.116667	41.366667	91	access	17855	39	1859.271565	396.7748674	54.6	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.5"	4	0.5		"*good candidate for bayesian modeling. quercus rise was rejected.  but really, just accept all ages and fit a spline? Or remove all pollen ages because they don't add much?"	y	y	"Yes, accept all 14C and biostrat ages and fit a spline, poly, or Bayes"	"accepted ALL ages available for site (rc and pollen) except top two rc dates and an obvious outlier at 559.5cm depth (503264), fit a smooth spline with smooth=0.5."
605	Lac Romer	ROM	-73.330833	45.963889	18	access	7435	0	1637.934637	901.3556051	10.8	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks fine.			OK	ok
606	Roque Island Hollow	ROQUEIS	-67.518	44.5729	20	excel	9503	89	2095.201707	857.3616703	12	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"benchmark site for tsuga, so new age looks fine."			OK	ok
607	Rose Swamp	ROSE1	-79.44	44.18	228	access	11562	-28	1238.505004	602.2352574	136.8	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks fine.			OK	ok
609	Rosebud	ROSEBUDB	-100.848611	43.229167	0	access	14821	14739	-370.0603416	390.859648	0	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
610	Rose Lake	ROSELK	-77.925	41.916667	690	access	17083	75	1401.187012	360.2733243	414	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
611	Rossburg Bog	ROSSBURG	-93.6	46.583333	372	access	11253	2000	173.2027501	779.9138343	223.2	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks fine.			OK	ok
612	Ross Pond	ROSSPOND	-69.410278	43.921389	37	access	13447	-22	1981.124248	742.8912008	22.2	y				linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		not sure whether to reject the two ages around the Tsuga decline or accept them and fit a smooth spline?	yy	y	"Accept all ages, fit a spline or poly"	"accepted all ages, fit smooth spline"
613	Rostock Mammoth Site	ROSTOCK1	-81	43.5	333	access	14616	12703	1135.526126	503.4317584	199.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
614	Round Pond	ROUND	-70.0095	41.9718	4	excel	3358	-27	1999.999111	508.6960687	2.4	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
615	Round Pond (CA:Ontario)	ROUNDON	-91.368889	52.533333	358	excel	8777	-30	299.998844	1483.785978	214.8	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
617	Ruby Lake	RUBYLAKE	-91.458333	45.283333	335	access	810	10	335.02492	632.206982	201	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
618	Rutz Lake	RUTZLAKE	-93.87	44.87	314	access	13663	-3	158.2678528	577.1148552	188.4	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"rejected one rc date, accepted both pollen ages."		y	"keep all, fit spline or poly"	"accepted all ages, fit smooth spline"
619	Ryerse Lake	RYERSE	-85.179167	46.131944	259	access	10021	874	785.3746965	769.2974917	155.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks fine.			OK	ok
620	Lac au Sable	SABLE	-66.216667	51.4	530	access	7600	4417	1939.395498	1651.330621	318	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
621	Lac ? Sam	SAM	-72.978889	46.654167	240	access	10585	360	1643.267197	986.5961864	144	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
622	Sandy Hill Pond	SANDY	-70.3621	41.6905	16	excel	1912	-49	1982.414022	469.2818781	9.6	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
623	Sandy Cove Pond	SANDYCOV	-57.716667	54.4	100	access	5206	0	2328.89975	2169.915517	60	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
624	Sandy Run Creek	SANDYRUN	-83.052	32.589	80	excel	30025	101	1155.820847	-789.7807361	48	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
625	Lac Manitou	SAV1	-74.466944	46.057778	454	access	11670	61	1554.80408	893.0126918	272.4	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks fine.			OK	ok
626	Lac aux Quenouilles	SAV2	-74.395833	46.171944	403	access	12629	56	1556.803575	907.3147343	241.8	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks fine.			OK	ok
627	Lake Site South Burin Peninsula	SBURIN	-55.6125	46.919444	114	access	15630	12838	2811.210606	1425.452478	68.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
628	Schoodic Peninsula Hollow	SCHOODIC	-68.0741	44.395	10	excel	7504	984	2061.601094	825.0665564	6	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks fine.			OK	ok
629	Scott Lake	SCOTTLK	-81.95	27.966667	51	access	4866	-18	1332.305416	-1303.599651	30.6	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
634	\LD\\ Lake\	SEPTILES	-67.131944	50.140278	122	access	7764	50	1925.933309	1492.082751	73.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
635	Saint-Francois de Sales	SFS	-72.146944	48.293889	358	access	9952	132	1653.274566	1188.545906	214.8	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
636	Shady Valley Bog	SHADYVAL	-81.933333	36.525	383	access	10817	515	1186.985665	-320.7228571	229.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
637	Sharkey Lake	SHARKEY	-93.411	44.5938	305	excel	13015	634	193.2571108	545.3331561	183	y			y	2nd order polynomial	Linear interpolation	1			"benchmark site for these biostrat markers. I tried playing around with 3rd, 4th, 5th order polys and smooth splines, but nothing worked well.  I feel like linear interpolation does just as good as two 2nd order polys and fairly accurately captures the original Neotoma chron."	y		"OK, agreed:  go with linear interpolation"	ok
638	Shaws Bog	SHAWSBOG	-64.183333	45.016667	30	access	10343	0	2314.463064	984.750614	18	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
639	Mont Shefford	SHE	-72.584722	45.358889	282	access	13270	63	1708.235439	845.1537504	169.2	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.35"	4	0.35		used tsuga decline rather than 1 rc date.  		y	"keep both, fit spline or poly"	"accepted all ages, fit smooth spline"
642	Shouldice Lake	SHOULD1	-81.416667	45.15	206	access	10636	9	1074.354097	691.2250462	123.6	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		used picea decline rather than the basal rc date.  			"keep both, fit spline or poly"	"accepted all ages, fit smooth spline"
643	Silcox Core 52	SILCOX52	-94.171389	57.211389	135	excel	3117	-34	108.0910633	2016.91437	81	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
646	Silver Lake (CA:Nova Scotia)	SILVERNS	-63.642778	44.563333	69	access	10971	0	2370.193473	947.5702872	41.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
647	Silver Lake (US:Pennsylvania)	SILVERPA	-74.986944	41.251389	402	access	789	-17	1642.748014	330.5186178	241.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
648	Sinkhole Pond	SINKHOLE	-70.35	43.966667	95	access	NA	NA	1911.427337	728.7481631	57	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"*All original dates were rejected. But, the pollen data indicate that these ages aren't too bad, at least for the top part of the core.  If I use them, I would reject 503609 and fit a smooth spline through the rest of the ages."	y		Tough oneƒ and hard to know what to do without a publication to evaluate the original 14C dates.  Let's just stick with the decision to reject the 14C dates and use our biostrat ages instead of Poland Spring's.	"ok, rejected all rc ages, accepted two pollen ages.  Fit linear interp model.  But, best just to ditch this site?"
649	Sioux Pond	SIOUX	-91.566667	49.933333	410	access	11112	3579	301.4172575	1179.310844	246	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
651	Smoot Lake Bog	SMOOTLK	-82.445833	40.205556	292	access	16701	12798	1082.312727	101.7560294	175.2	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks fine.			OK	ok
652	Snake Pond	SNAKE	-72.0148	42.5566	282	excel	2449	-38	1831.840769	534.8860871	169.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
653	Snow Lake	SNOW	-63.883333	56.633333	522	access	5679	0	1884.365978	2272.234608	313.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
657	South Bog	SOUTHBOG	-67.1882	44.7286	35	excel	2981	-43	2113.208294	882.2501926	21	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
660	Spirit Lake (US:Michigan)	SPIRIT	-86.958333	46.47	203	access	12764	-20	652.872224	795.5002181	121.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
661	Spiritwood Lake	SPIRITWD	-98.587222	47.073611	437	access	9270	-15	-185.131979	838.1090112	262.2	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new ages look fine.			OK	ok
662	Basswood Road Lake/Splan Pond	SPLANPD	-67.330556	45.255556	106	access	13497	10796	2084.54136	938.5306971	63.6	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			benchmark site for these events.  keep in the age model.			OK	ok
663	Spring Lake (US:Pennsylvania)	SPRINGLK	-76.35	41.673889	342	access	14703	0	1527.502604	356.4867373	205.2	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		accept all ages and fit a smooth spline rahter than linear interpolation.	y		OK	ok
664	Spruce Pond	SPRUCE	-74.204167	41.239444	223	access	14480	119	1703.202809	342.9580382	133.8	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new ages look fine.			"OK, great"	ok
665	Stage's Pond	STAGESPD	-82.9375	39.668056	212	access	3670	64	1052.014535	33.4449774	127.2	n	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
668	Steel Lake	STEELMN	-94.684	46.974	415	excel	11279	-50	94.33988484	824.4840141	249	y			y	Linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.7"	4	0.7		"*benchmark site, so new ages look fine.  In original chron, 2 sets of dates were averaged, here kept separate.  This is ok for the upper dates (486 cm depth), but for the deeper ages (946 cm), not averaging causes a small reversal. Fit a spline with smooth=0.7 to account for this."	y		OK	ok
669	Saint John Island Pond	STJOHN	-58.916667	53.95	137	access	6001	30	2279.587514	2092.719257	82.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
674	Stotzel-Leis Site	STOTZEL	-84.689444	40.216667	309	access	17980	33	903.9382588	79.55032233	185.4	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"accepted picea decline plus 2 previously rejected dates. Rejected date next to picea, kept linear interp"	y	y	Add back that rejected 14C date near Picea and fit a poly or spline	"accepted all ages except basal age, fit smooth spline"
675	Stewart's Dark Lake	STWDARK2	-91.45	45.3	335	access	12470	1923	335.5446633	634.2035306	201	y				linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"Not sure what to do here.  ulmus doesn't add much with picea nearby and just serves to skew the chron.  So, I could reject it and fit a linear interp model.  Or I could keep ulmus in and fit a smooth spline?  Either way has the effect of making ages a bit younger through this section, but the linear interp option makes this a more abrupt shift."	yy	y	Delete Ulmus and keep Picea	"rejected ulmus, accepted all other ages. Linear interp model"
676	Sugarloaf Pond	SUGRLOAF	-52.666667	47.616667	100	access	7869	-27	2966.012978	1589.585698	60	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
678	Sutherland Pond	SUTHRLND	-74.037778	41.391389	380	access	14902	44	1711.852289	363.4239335	228	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			benchmark site for these events. chron looks great.			OK	ok
679	Swan Lake (US:Nebraska)	SWANLAKE	-102.508611	41.721389	0	access	9977	32	-508.8062509	220.6907432	0	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
681	Szabo Pond	SZABOPND	-74.483333	40.4	29	access	13299	-25	1704.06629	241.416591	17.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks fine.			OK	ok
683	Tamarack Creek	TAMARACK	-91.45	44.15	244	access	4892	11	342.0653945	498.4491844	146.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
684	Tannersville Bog	TANNERSV	-75.266667	41.033333	277	access	16276	50	1626.818943	300.5674028	166.2	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.25"	4	0.25		"reject quercus, change age model to smooth spline"	y		OK	ok
686	Taupawshas Bog	TAUPAW	-70.058333	41.275	14	access	12725	-30	2018.579358	428.4209431	8.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"Rejected rc date (503799) and quercus, fit linear interp"	y	y	"This site is on Nantucket Island, so may be behaving a bit differently from mainland sites.  I'd skip the biostrat ages here and just go with 14C."	"kept all rc dates, reject all new pollen ages. Fit linear interpolation"
687	Taylor Creek Site 2	TAYCRK2A	-80.643889	25.205556	5	access	499	-35	1505.871681	-1594.958978	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
688	Taylor Creek Site 2	TAYCRK2B	-80.643889	25.205556	5	access	1483	-26	1505.871681	-1594.958978	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
689	Taylor Slough Site 15	TAYLSL15	-80.687222	25.201944	5	access	554	-42	1501.725223	-1596.050442	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
690	Taylor Slough Site 7	TAYLSL7	-80.646389	25.287222	5	access	3857	-36	1504.135738	-1585.861521	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
691	Terhell Pond	TERHELL	-95.770556	47.187778	442	access	4811	-8	16.38758121	849.0716381	265.2	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"It would be nice to have a deeper age to constrain this, but the new age is ok. "			OK	ok
692	Petit Lac Terrien	TERRIEN	-70.62	46.58	404	access	14688	0	1810.114047	1021.092051	242.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new ages look fine.			OK	ok
693	Thibaudeau CORE127B	THIB127B	-94.149722	57.099167	125	excel	6934	-34	109.6210764	2004.162038	75	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
698	Titicut Swamp	TITICUT1	-71.033333	41.95	20	access	3396	0	1923.753302	485.02428	12	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new ages look fine.			OK	ok
701	Tom Swamp	TOMSWAMP	-72.2125	42.516667	231	access	14916	200	1818.233051	526.5098487	138.6	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			rejected picea rise and quercus rise.  Accepted picea decline and radiocarbon ages.	y		OK	ok
702	Tonawa Lake	TONAWA	-77.175	44.85	274	access	11478	-30	1390.183964	711.4589282	164.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new ages look fine.			OK	ok
703	Lac ? la Tortue	TOR	-73.316944	45.545833	137	access	10233	0	1650.622732	853.6193936	82.2	y			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1			new age looks fine.			OK	ok
705	Trout Lake Bog	TROUTLBG	-85.013	46.21	259	excel	3580	-29	796.3155237	779.8404358	155.4	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
707	Lake Tulane	TULANEG	-81.5008	27.5895	32	excel	60639	1050	1381.152464	-1339.863138	19.2	n		y	y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	4	0.3						changed to smooth spline to get rid of small age reversal
709	Lac Turcotte	TUR	-65.762778	49.157778	447	access	12166	667	2050.428414	1410.930517	268.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
712	Twiss Marl Pond	TWISMARL	-79.9525	43.447778	256	excel	12732	-45	1215.12983	510.3286591	153.6	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"wow, a lot of rejected dates in this chron (which is why we didn't use it as a benchmark chron).  however, picea decline lines up well with the retained dates."			OK	ok
713	Unknown Pond	UNKNOWN	-70.633333	45.6	489	access	NA	NA	1839.786291	909.2223244	293.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"original age model rejected all radiocarbon ages and used 3 stratigraphic dates from Dufresne.  So, will accept the picea rise and tsuga decline dates here."			OK	ok
715	Upper Mallot Lake	UPMALLOT	-84.258333	47.308333	422	access	11269	0	834.7265504	915.0330641	253.2	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
717	Upper Wallface Pond	UPWALLFC	-74.054167	44.146389	948	access	13053	200	1635.89907	680.0167323	568.8	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.2"	4	0.2		not sure whether to reject picea rise or the rc age .Rejected rc age. Fit linear interp	y	y	keep both and fit spline or poly	"kept all dates originally accepted by authors (ie, two dates rejected, at 140 and 208 cm).  Accepted all pollen ages.  Fit spline"
718	Valhalla Hollow	VALHALLA	-74.370833	44.308611	480	access	1127	-44	1608.371101	693.2685021	288	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
719	Van Nostrand Lake	VANNOSTR	-79.38	44	297	access	11066	0	1246.657404	582.0704268	178.2	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"all ages look fine. Rejected rc date near picea decline, kept linear interp"		y	keep all and fit spline or poly	"kept all dates originally accepted by authors (ie, date rejected at 485 cm).  Accepted all pollen ages.  Fit spline"
721	Baie du Diana	VHC1	-69.832778	60.782778	50	access	7215	289	1417.977083	2613.95056	30	n			y	linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
722	Volo Bog	VOLOBOG	-88.184444	42.351111	229	access	12901	103	604.6365522	302.5581112	137.4	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		rejected 504025 in favor of 2 pollen strat dates		y	keep all and fit spline or poly	"accepted all ages, fit smooth spline"
724	"Water Conservation Area 2A, Site 2 (Site F1)"	WCA2AF1	-80.370556	26.359722	5	access	2228	-41	1510.913039	-1461.227679	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
725	"Water Conservation Area 2A, Site 3 (Site U3)"	WCA2AU3	-80.411389	26.2875	5	access	2036	-36	1508.347476	-1469.989801	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
726	"Water Conservation Area 3A, Site 4 (CA315 (AAS))"	WCA3A15	-80.668889	28.974167	5	access	2508	-38	1434.152905	-1170.656716	3	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
727	Webbs Lake	WEBBS	-78.100833	44.168056	234	excel	8445	-30	1337.777182	619.0438221	140.4	y			y	Linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"accept tsuga, reject radiocarbon"		y	keep all and fit spline or poly	"accepted all ages, fit smooth spline"
729	Wentzel's Pond	WENTZEL	-94.95	46.95	435	access	2411	-30	75.30343039	821.4142054	261	n	y		y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
730	Weslemkoon Lake	WESLEM1	-77.433333	45.033333	316	access	10591	6706	1367.13672	728.9476733	189.6	y			y	linear interpolation	1st order polynomial	2	1		"accepted picea decline and rejected both basal radiocarbon dates, but I'm not totally happy with this."	y	y	Maybe a linear regression would be best here.	accepted all ages except basal age at 211.5 cm (rejected by authors) and fit a linear regression through ages.
731	Weslemkoon Lake	WESLEM2	-77.433333	45.033333	316	access	7520	37	1367.13672	728.9476733	189.6	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
732	West Hawk Lake	WESTHAWK	-95.19	49.758	330	excel	9446	62	55.26631459	1151.907445	198	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
733	West Olaf Lake	WESTOLAF	-96.187	46.6	0	excel	9020	27	-13.49293289	779.7020269	0	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	4	0.2						changed age model to smooth spline to smooth over age reversal.
734	White Pond	WHITEPND	-80.775	34.166667	90	access	22455	0	1328.066444	-578.14002	54	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		rejected radiocarbon age in favor of pollen ages.		y	keep all and fit spline or poly	"accepted all ages, fit smooth spline"
735	Whitney's Gulch	WHITGLCH	-57.3	51.516667	98	access	11098	-26	2485.973812	1872.383288	58.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
737	Wickett Pond	WICKETT	-72.4281	42.555	327	excel	2135	-35	1800.981144	526.7837842	196.2	n			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
738	Willow River Pond	WILWRDPD	-92.783333	46.333333	314	access	8619	5917	233.1213748	752.1615773	188.4	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
740	Winneconnet Pond	WINNE	-71.116667	41.966667	20	access	16343	35	1916.969625	485.2376471	12	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		rejected 504099 in favor of 2 pollen strat dates		y	keep all and fit spline or poly	"accepted all ages, fit smooth spline"
741	Wintergreen Lake	WINTERGR	-85.383333	42.4	271	access	15432	-20	819.907273	329.356415	162.6	y			y	linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		accepted both new ages and fit a smooth spline through the ages.	y		OK	ok
742	White Lake	WL02-1	-74.908	41.002	138	excel	14247	8204	1655.315859	303.1663773	82.8	y			y	Linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"benchmark site, so new ages are good."			OK	ok
743	Winter Gulf Site	WNTRGULF	-78.933889	42.561111	248	access	14999	14857	1310.214548	420.6913289	148.8	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
744	Wolf Creek	WOLFCRK	-94.116667	46.116667	375	access	24475	10780	137.0161828	723.9822742	225	n			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
745	Wolsfeld Lake	WOLSFELD	-93.566667	45	291	access	14411	-25	180.4078137	593.015246	174.6	y			y	cubic spline	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		"kept all new ages, but changed age model to a smooth spline."	y		OK.  Crazy cubic spline!	ok
746	Wolverine Lake	WOLVERIN	-85.661111	46.429167	259	access	11501	120	746.7172967	800.280574	155.4	y			y	linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new age is ok	y		OK	ok
748	Wood Lake	WOODLAKE	-90.083333	45.333333	464	access	15725	145	435.9695813	643.6975133	278.4	y				quadratic regression	2nd degree polynomial	2	2		"picea and ulmus at same depth, ages differ by ~1000 years.  since original age model was 2nd order poly, keep all ages and age model."	y		"OK.  As a side question, why is the error envelope for Ulmus >15000 years?  That seems high."	ok
751	Wylde Bog	WYLDEBOG	-80.4	43.9	484	access	8185	53	1172.798909	557.4038742	290.4	y				linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			"tsuga age is good.  Also has alnus and picea declines, which creates two sharp changes in sed rate, but keeping both in for now."	y		OK	ok
752	Wylde Lake	WYLDELK	-80.4	43.91	484	access	12714	-25	1172.605271	558.5699382	290.4	y				linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1			new ages look fine.			OK	ok
753	Lac Yelle	YELLE	-79.637778	48.503889	356	access	9998	0	1136.204856	1102.474527	213.6	n				linear interpolation (+ extrapolation)	Linear interpolation	1							
754	Yellow Dog Pond	YELLOWDG	-87.95	46.75	445	access	10268	0	578.6463873	821.9773149	267	n				linear interpolation	Linear interpolation	1							
755	Zuehl Farm Site	ZUEHL	-93.87	43.03	356	access	13963	1064	163.1540084	359.6860347	213.6	y				linear interpolation	"Smooth spline, smooth=0.3"	4	0.3		rejected 504215 in favor of picea decline		y	"keep all, fit spline or poly"	"accepted all ages, fit smooth spline"